A field-ready LOI framework built for independent agency acquisitions — covering book of business earnouts, carrier appointment continuity, client retention protections, and SBA-compatible deal structures from $1M to $5M in revenue.
Acquiring an independent P&C insurance agency is fundamentally an acquisition of recurring commission revenue — and your Letter of Intent must reflect that reality. Unlike a traditional business LOI, an insurance agency LOI must address the transferability of carrier appointments, the stickiness of the book of business, earnout mechanics tied to retention and premium volume, and the seller's ongoing role in managing client relationships during transition. A well-drafted LOI signals to the seller that you understand how insurance agencies work, reduces negotiation friction later in the process, and creates a shared framework for due diligence. This guide walks you through every key section of the LOI, provides specific example language tailored to P&C agency acquisitions, and highlights the negotiation pressure points that determine whether a deal closes on favorable terms. Whether you are a first-time buyer using SBA financing, an independent agent acquiring a retiring owner's book, or a PE-backed aggregator adding a regional agency to your platform, this LOI template gives you a defensible starting position built on how these deals actually get done in the lower middle market.
Find Insurance Agency (P&C) Businesses to AcquireParties and Transaction Overview
Identifies the buyer entity, the selling agency entity, and the individual principal seller. Specifies whether the transaction is structured as an asset purchase or a stock purchase, which has significant implications for carrier appointment continuity and liability assumption. Most P&C agency acquisitions are structured as asset purchases to isolate pre-closing E&O exposure and facilitate cleaner carrier appointment transfers.
Example Language
This Letter of Intent is entered into between [Buyer Entity Name], a [State] [LLC/Corporation] ('Buyer'), and [Agency Name], a [State] [LLC/Corporation] ('Seller'), and [Seller Principal Name], individually ('Principal'). Buyer proposes to acquire substantially all of the assets of Seller's independent P&C insurance agency business, including the book of business, carrier appointments (subject to carrier approval), agency management system data, client files, trade name, and goodwill, through an Asset Purchase Agreement ('APA') to be negotiated in good faith following the execution of this LOI.
💡 Sellers often prefer a stock sale to achieve capital gains tax treatment and avoid triggering carrier approval processes for appointment transfers. Buyers strongly prefer asset purchases to isolate pre-closing E&O and regulatory liability. Address this tension early — a hybrid structure with indemnification carve-outs is sometimes workable, but asset purchase is the market-standard structure for sub-$5M P&C agency deals, particularly when SBA financing is involved. SBA lenders will almost universally require an asset purchase structure.
Purchase Price and Valuation Basis
States the proposed total purchase price, the valuation methodology applied, and how the price is allocated between tangible assets and goodwill attributable to the book of business. P&C agencies in the lower middle market typically transact at 4x–7x EBITDA or, alternatively, at 1.2x–2.0x annualized commission revenue, depending on book quality, line mix, and carrier diversification. The LOI should clearly state which metric is being used as the valuation anchor.
Example Language
Buyer proposes a total purchase price of $[X,XXX,XXX] ('Purchase Price'), representing approximately [X.Xx] times the Agency's trailing twelve-month adjusted EBITDA of $[XXX,XXX] as reported for the fiscal year ending [Date], or alternatively [X.Xx] times annualized net commission and fee revenue of $[X,XXX,XXX]. The Purchase Price is subject to adjustment based on findings from financial, operational, and book of business due diligence. Approximately $[XXX,XXX] of the Purchase Price is attributable to tangible assets, with the balance allocated to goodwill, customer relationships, and the going-concern value of the book of business.
💡 Sellers anchored to revenue multiples typically cite 1.5x–2.0x commissions based on aggregator acquisition activity in the market. Buyers anchored to EBITDA multiples will push back on owner compensation add-backs and one-time contingency income. Agree upfront on whether contingency and profit-sharing income is included in the revenue base — this single item can shift valuation by 15–25% on a well-performing commercial lines agency. Request three years of contingency income history during LOI diligence to support your position.
Deal Structure and Payment Terms
Outlines how the Purchase Price will be paid, including cash at closing, seller note, earnout tied to post-closing retention and premium volume, and any equity rollover if the buyer is a PE-backed aggregator. This section is one of the most heavily negotiated in P&C agency M&A because the risk of client attrition post-closing directly impacts what the buyer is actually acquiring.
Example Language
The Purchase Price shall be payable as follows: (i) $[X,XXX,XXX] in cash at closing ('Closing Payment'), funded through a combination of [SBA 7(a) loan proceeds / equity / senior debt]; (ii) a Seller Note in the amount of $[XXX,XXX] bearing interest at [X]% per annum, payable over [24/36/60] months, subordinated to any senior lender; and (iii) an earnout of up to $[XXX,XXX] payable over [12/24] months post-closing, calculated based on the retention of in-force premium volume and commission revenue from the acquired book of business, with specific mechanics to be defined in the APA. The earnout will be measured against a baseline of $[X,XXX,XXX] in annualized net commission revenue as of the closing date.
💡 Sellers will push to maximize the cash-at-close component and minimize earnout exposure. Buyers need earnout protection because they are acquiring a relationship-based asset where attrition risk is highest in months 1–18 post-closing. A reasonable market structure for a $2M–$4M revenue agency is 70–80% cash at close with 20–30% in a combination of seller note and earnout. If using SBA 7(a) financing, confirm with your lender that the seller note structure and subordination terms comply with SBA standby provisions — typically the seller note must be on full standby for the duration of the SBA loan in many structures.
Earnout Mechanics and Retention Measurement
Defines specifically how the post-closing earnout will be calculated, what constitutes a 'retained' account, how premium volume changes (due to market conditions, rate increases, or coverage changes unrelated to attrition) will be treated, and what obligations the seller has during the measurement period to actively support retention. This is the most consequential and frequently disputed section in P&C agency LOIs.
Example Language
The earnout shall be calculated based on net commission and fee revenue attributable to the acquired book of business during the [12/24]-month period following the Closing Date ('Earnout Period'). Earnout payments will be made [quarterly/annually] and calculated as follows: if retained commission revenue equals or exceeds [90%] of the Closing Baseline Revenue, the full earnout of $[XXX,XXX] shall be paid. Earnout payments shall be prorated on a linear basis for retention between [75%] and [90%], and no earnout shall be paid if retained revenue falls below [75%] of Closing Baseline Revenue. For purposes of earnout calculation, 'retained revenue' shall exclude attrition resulting from (i) carrier-initiated non-renewals in markets experiencing underwriting restrictions, (ii) insured business closures unrelated to service quality, and (iii) premium reductions resulting from market-wide rate decreases. Seller Principal agrees to actively participate in client retention activities during the Earnout Period as outlined in the Transition Services Agreement.
💡 Sellers will fight hard for carve-outs that protect them from earnout reductions caused by factors outside their control — particularly carrier market exits (e.g., a carrier pulling out of coastal homeowners or wildfire-exposed commercial lines) and economic conditions affecting client businesses. These carve-outs are reasonable and should be granted. However, buyers should resist overly broad carve-outs that could allow a non-cooperative seller to claim force majeure for ordinary attrition. The definition of what counts as 'retained' should be agreed in the LOI, not left to APA negotiation, because this is where deals blow up after exclusivity is granted.
Carrier Appointment Continuity
Addresses the transferability of the agency's carrier appointments and appointment agreements, which are the operational backbone of an independent agency's ability to place business. Carrier approvals are required for appointment transfers in an asset purchase and can take 30–120 days, creating closing risk. The LOI should establish expectations for how appointment continuity will be managed and what happens if key carrier appointments cannot be transferred.
Example Language
Buyer's obligation to close is conditioned upon Seller's reasonable cooperation in facilitating the transfer or reissuance of carrier appointments for all carriers representing [X%] or more of the Agency's in-force premium volume ('Material Carriers'). Seller shall notify all Material Carriers of the proposed transaction within [10] business days of LOI execution, and both parties shall cooperate in completing all required carrier appointment applications, ACORD forms, and background check requirements. In the event that any Material Carrier declines to appoint Buyer prior to Closing, the parties shall negotiate in good faith regarding a potential purchase price adjustment or an extended closing timeline. Seller agrees to maintain all existing carrier appointments in good standing through the Closing Date and shall not take any action that could jeopardize appointment continuity without Buyer's prior written consent.
💡 This is a non-negotiable condition for any sophisticated buyer. Get a complete list of all carrier appointments and their premium contribution percentage during LOI due diligence. If the top three carriers represent more than 60% of premium volume, you have concentration risk that should be reflected in your earnout structure or closing conditions. Some carriers — particularly standard market carriers like Travelers, Chubb, or Hartford — have established appointment transfer processes for acquisitions and are generally accommodating. Non-standard or specialty market carriers may be more restrictive. Start carrier outreach early and do not grant exclusivity without at least informal confirmation from key carriers.
Due Diligence Period and Access
Defines the length of the due diligence period, what information the seller must provide, how access to the agency management system and client data will be structured, and any confidentiality restrictions around employee and carrier communications during diligence. P&C agency due diligence requires access to the AMS/policy management system, which contains the most granular book of business data.
Example Language
Following execution of this LOI, Seller shall provide Buyer with a [45/60]-day exclusive due diligence period ('Due Diligence Period') during which Buyer and its advisors shall have reasonable access to the Agency's financial records, tax returns (3 years), AMS/policy management system data exports, carrier appointment agreements, producer and employee files, E&O insurance history, contingency income documentation, and any pending or threatened claims or regulatory matters. Seller shall provide a complete book of business export from [Agency Management System Name] within [10] business days of LOI execution, including policy-level detail showing carrier, line of business, annual premium, commission rate, renewal date, and client tenure. Buyer agrees to maintain strict confidentiality of all diligence materials and to limit access to advisors bound by the terms of the existing NDA.
💡 Sellers are understandably nervous about buyers seeing their full client list before a deal closes — a bad actor buyer could use this information to compete. Ensure the NDA executed prior to LOI contains robust non-solicitation provisions covering both clients and employees. During due diligence, prioritize the book of business export and retention rate analysis above everything else — this data will validate or invalidate your purchase price assumption. If the seller's AMS data is incomplete, disorganized, or inconsistent with the revenue figures represented, treat this as a serious red flag requiring resolution before you proceed.
Exclusivity
Grants the buyer an exclusive negotiating period during which the seller agrees not to solicit, entertain, or advance discussions with other potential buyers. Exclusivity is the buyer's most valuable LOI protection and should be tied to the due diligence timeline.
Example Language
In consideration of Buyer's commitment of time and resources to due diligence and transaction documentation, Seller and Principal agree that from the date of LOI execution through the earlier of (i) [60] days or (ii) the termination of this LOI ('Exclusivity Period'), neither Seller nor Principal shall, directly or indirectly, solicit, discuss, negotiate, or enter into any agreement with any third party regarding a sale, merger, recapitalization, or any other disposition of the Agency or its assets. Seller shall promptly notify Buyer if any unsolicited offer or inquiry is received during the Exclusivity Period.
💡 Sellers represented by experienced M&A brokers will try to limit exclusivity to 30 days or condition it on demonstrated financing progress. Buyers should push for 60 days minimum given the complexity of carrier approval processes and AMS data review. If the seller insists on 30 days, agree — but use that deadline to prioritize the highest-risk diligence items first: book of business quality, carrier concentration, and E&O history. Exclusivity without a corresponding buyer good-faith obligation to advance financing and documentation is one-sided and sellers should resist it.
Transition and Non-Solicitation
Outlines the seller principal's post-closing obligations, including the duration and scope of a transition services period, client introduction requirements, and the geographic and temporal scope of non-solicitation and non-compete covenants. This section directly protects the buyer's most important asset — the client relationships they are paying for.
Example Language
Seller Principal agrees to remain engaged with the Agency as an employee or independent contractor for a transition period of [12/18/24] months following the Closing Date at a mutually agreed compensation rate, during which time Principal shall (i) introduce Buyer's designated service team to all commercial accounts representing more than $[X,XXX] in annual commission revenue, (ii) participate in renewal meetings for accounts renewing within the first [12] months post-closing, and (iii) cooperate fully with Buyer's client communication and rebranding strategy. Principal shall be subject to a non-solicitation covenant prohibiting the solicitation of transferred clients or Agency employees for a period of [3/4/5] years following the Closing Date, and a non-compete covenant restricting Principal from engaging in the sale of P&C insurance products within [XX]-mile radius of the Agency's primary office for a period of [2/3] years, subject to applicable state law enforceability.
💡 The transition period is arguably more valuable than the non-compete in an insurance agency acquisition. A seller who is genuinely committed to a 18–24 month transition will protect far more revenue than any legal covenant. Structure earnout payments to run concurrent with the transition period to align seller incentives with client retention. Non-compete enforceability varies significantly by state — confirm with local counsel before finalizing geographic scope and duration. In states with weak non-compete enforcement (California, Minnesota, Oklahoma, North Dakota), focus more heavily on non-solicitation covenants, which are more consistently enforceable.
Financing Conditions
States the buyer's financing plan and any conditions to closing tied to financing approval. For SBA-financed acquisitions, this section must address the SBA loan approval process and timeline, which directly affects the closing schedule.
Example Language
Buyer intends to finance the transaction through a combination of (i) proceeds from an SBA 7(a) loan through [Lender Name / 'a qualified SBA preferred lender'], in an amount not to exceed $[X,XXX,XXX]; (ii) Buyer equity contribution of not less than [10%] of the total transaction value; and (iii) the Seller Note described herein. Buyer shall submit a complete SBA loan application within [15] business days of LOI execution and shall provide Seller with periodic updates on financing status. Buyer's obligation to close is conditioned upon receipt of SBA loan approval on terms materially consistent with those described herein. In the event SBA financing is not approved within [90] days of application submission, either party may terminate this LOI without further obligation.
💡 SBA 7(a) loans are the most common financing vehicle for sub-$5M independent agency acquisitions, offering up to $5M in loan proceeds, 10-year terms for goodwill-heavy acquisitions, and relatively competitive rates. SBA lenders who specialize in insurance agency acquisitions — including Live Oak Bank and a handful of community banks with insurance M&A experience — will underwrite the book of business quality directly, not just the historical financials. Expect the SBA approval process to take 60–90 days from complete application submission. Build this into your exclusivity and closing timeline from day one.
Representations and Pre-Closing Covenants
Establishes the seller's obligation to operate the agency in the ordinary course during the period between LOI signing and closing, and previews the material representations that will be made in the APA. This section protects the buyer from adverse changes to the book of business or carrier relationships before closing.
Example Language
From the date of this LOI through the Closing Date, Seller shall operate the Agency in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice and shall not, without Buyer's prior written consent: (i) terminate or materially modify any carrier appointment agreement; (ii) solicit, encourage, or permit the departure of any licensed producer or key employee; (iii) offer material discounts or fee waivers to clients outside the ordinary course; (iv) write significant new commercial accounts outside the Agency's historical lines of business; or (v) incur any material new liabilities or commitments. Seller represents that, to Seller's knowledge, no carrier has notified Seller of any intent to terminate or materially restrict Seller's appointment authority, and there are no pending E&O claims, regulatory investigations, or disciplinary proceedings against the Agency or any licensed employee.
💡 Pre-closing covenants in an LOI are typically non-binding, but they set the tone and create a contractual framework that will be replicated in the APA. The most important pre-closing protection in an insurance agency deal is preventing the seller from allowing key producers or account managers to depart — staff departures in the months before closing are a leading indicator of client attrition after closing. Consider requesting a list of all licensed employees and their tenure as part of initial diligence, and monitor any departures closely during the exclusivity period.
Earnout Baseline Revenue Definition
The revenue figure used as the benchmark for measuring post-closing retention is the single most consequential number in the LOI. Sellers will want to use a trailing twelve-month figure that includes any unusually high contingency income or one-time accounts. Buyers should push for a normalized baseline that excludes non-recurring items, accounts the seller knows are non-renewing, and contingency income that is not contractually guaranteed. Agree on the exact dollar figure and methodology in the LOI — do not leave this to APA negotiation.
Carrier Appointment Transfer as Closing Condition
Determine upfront which carrier appointments are 'Material Carriers' for closing purposes. If the top two carriers represent 55% of premium, losing one appointment should give the buyer the right to either renegotiate price or walk away. Define this threshold in the LOI and confirm that both parties agree on what constitutes a Material Carrier before exclusivity is granted.
Seller Transition Period Length and Compensation
The seller's transition commitment is directly correlated with client retention, which drives earnout payments. Negotiate a transition period of at least 12 months for any agency where the principal holds key commercial relationships. Structure the seller's compensation during the transition period to be meaningful enough that the seller is genuinely motivated — a nominal consulting fee creates misaligned incentives and typically results in a disengaged seller and elevated attrition.
E&O Tail Coverage Responsibility
Errors and omissions tail coverage for pre-closing policy servicing errors is a material cost item — typically 150–200% of the annual E&O premium for a three-year tail. Determine in the LOI who bears this cost. Market practice varies: in asset purchases, sellers typically bear tail coverage responsibility, but this is negotiable. A $2M revenue agency might have annual E&O premiums of $8,000–$15,000, making the tail cost $12,000–$30,000 — not trivial and worth addressing explicitly rather than leaving to APA negotiation.
Client Concentration Adjustment Mechanism
If due diligence reveals that any single client represents more than 10% of total commission revenue, or that the top five clients represent more than 35% of revenue, negotiate a specific purchase price adjustment mechanism tied to the retention of those accounts. A large commercial account that non-renews in month three post-closing could eliminate a significant portion of the value you paid for. Define concentration thresholds in the LOI and agree on how discovered concentration risk will be addressed before signing a binding APA.
Non-Compete Geographic Scope and Duration
Non-compete enforceability in insurance agency acquisitions depends heavily on state law, and buyers frequently discover after closing that the non-compete they relied upon is unenforceable or narrower than expected. Negotiate the geographic radius and duration explicitly in the LOI, confirm enforceability with local counsel before signing the APA, and ensure that the non-solicitation covenant — which is independently valuable and more consistently enforceable — is drafted to cover both direct and indirect solicitation of transferred clients.
Staff Retention and Producer Agreement Assignment
If the agency has licensed producers or CSRs who manage significant client relationships, their continued employment post-closing is essential to retention. Negotiate in the LOI that key staff will be offered employment continuity by the buyer on materially comparable terms, and that the seller will not disparage the buyer or encourage staff departures. If any key producer operates under a producer agreement with non-solicitation provisions, confirm those agreements are assignable to the buyer and will survive the closing.
Find Insurance Agency (P&C) Businesses to Acquire
Enough information to write a strong LOI on day one — free to join.
The most common earnout structure for independent P&C agency acquisitions involves a 12–24 month measurement period following closing, with earnout payments calculated based on the retention of in-force commission revenue relative to a closing baseline. A market-standard structure pays the full earnout if retention exceeds 90% of baseline revenue, prorates payment linearly between 75–90% retention, and pays nothing below 75%. For a $2M revenue agency with a $400,000 earnout component, this means the seller earns the full earnout if you retain $1.8M or more in commissions during the earnout period, and earns nothing if retention falls below $1.5M. Earnout periods longer than 24 months are uncommon in sub-$5M deals because they create too much uncertainty for sellers and complicate SBA loan structures.
Yes — P&C insurance agencies are among the most SBA-eligible acquisition targets in the service sector. SBA 7(a) loans can finance up to $5M of an acquisition, making them well-suited for the $1M–$5M revenue agency market. Because the primary asset being acquired is goodwill and the book of business rather than hard assets, SBA lenders who specialize in insurance agency acquisitions will underwrite the quality of the book of business, retention rates, and carrier relationships directly. Key requirements include a minimum 10% buyer equity injection, a seller note structured on full standby per SBA guidelines, and a business valuation supporting the purchase price. Live Oak Bank, Byline Bank, and select community banks with insurance industry specialization are among the most active SBA lenders in this space.
In an asset purchase — the most common structure for P&C agency acquisitions — carrier appointments do not automatically transfer to the buyer. Each carrier must independently approve and appoint the buying entity. This process typically requires the buyer to complete carrier appointment applications, submit to background checks, provide financial statements, and in some cases demonstrate prior insurance industry experience. Carriers generally take 30–90 days to process appointment requests, and some carriers will condition approval on reviewing the buyer's acquisition plan. The risk of a key carrier declining to appoint the buyer is a real deal risk and should be addressed as a closing condition in both the LOI and the APA. Start carrier outreach within days of LOI execution — do not wait until due diligence is complete.
If due diligence reveals that one or more clients represent a disproportionate share of commission revenue — particularly if a single client exceeds 10% of total commissions — you have three options: negotiate a purchase price reduction to reflect the concentration risk, add a specific closing condition requiring that the concentrated client sign a letter of understanding or direct appointment with the buyer prior to closing, or structure an additional earnout component specifically tied to the retention of that account. The worst outcome is closing without addressing discovered concentration risk and then losing the large account in month six — by that point you have limited recourse. If the seller represents that a large commercial account has a strong multi-year relationship, request permission to meet with the client's key contact during diligence as part of the transition introduction process.
The AMS data export is the most granular and reliable source of book of business truth available during due diligence. Request a policy-level export showing carrier name, line of business, annual premium, commission rate, policy effective date, renewal date, and client tenure for every active policy in the book. Use this data to independently calculate total annualized commission revenue and compare it to the financial statements — material discrepancies are a red flag. Analyze retention rates by calculating the percentage of policies that renewed in each of the last three years. Review carrier concentration by premium to identify dependency on any single carrier. Flag any carriers that have recently announced underwriting restrictions or market exits in the agency's geographic territory, as this creates forward-looking revenue risk that may not be reflected in historical financials.
Enforceability of non-compete covenants in connection with business acquisitions varies significantly by state, but courts are generally more willing to enforce non-competes in the context of a business sale than in an employment context — particularly when the seller received substantial consideration. In most states, a 3–5 year non-compete with a reasonable geographic radius tied to the agency's operating territory is enforceable when associated with the sale of a business. California, Minnesota, Oklahoma, and North Dakota are notable exceptions where even business-sale non-competes face enforceability challenges. In all states, ensure that non-solicitation covenants — which prohibit the seller from soliciting transferred clients or employees regardless of geography — are drafted independently of the non-compete so that if the non-compete is challenged, the non-solicitation survives. Always confirm enforceability with local counsel before signing the APA.
In practice, the terms are often used interchangeably in lower middle market M&A, but there is a meaningful distinction. A Letter of Intent (LOI) is typically a longer-form document that addresses most major deal terms, pre-closing covenants, and due diligence process in a single document, with only specific provisions (like exclusivity and confidentiality) being legally binding. A term sheet is typically shorter — often one to two pages — and summarizes the key economic terms of the deal without extensive operational or process language. For P&C insurance agency acquisitions, a full LOI is strongly preferred over a bare term sheet because the complexity of earnout mechanics, carrier appointment conditions, and transition obligations requires enough specificity to confirm that the parties are genuinely aligned before the buyer invests in full due diligence and legal fees.
More Insurance Agency (P&C) Guides
More LOI Templates
Get enough diligence data to write a confident LOI from day one.
Create your free accountNo credit card required
For Buyers
For Sellers