We count 35,030 operating Logistics & Freight Brokerage businesses in the U.S. 89.5% carry no chain or franchise brand. The most are in Texas, California and Florida.
Operating businesses, not businesses listed for sale. Data as of 2026-11-06.
Find Logistics & Freight Brokerage businesses →35,030
Operating businesses (U.S.)
89.5%
Independent (no chain or franchise brand)
Texas
State with the most
| Top states | Businesses | More |
|---|---|---|
| Texas | 4,075 | Texas report |
| California | 3,612 | California report |
| Florida | 2,783 | Florida report |
| Illinois | 2,192 | Illinois report |
| Georgia | 1,444 | Georgia report |
The freight brokerage and logistics industry serves as the connective tissue of the US supply chain, matching shippers with carriers across truckload, LTL, and intermodal modes. The sector is highly fragmented with tens of thousands of licensed brokers, the vast majority being small independents generating under $10M in gross revenue, making it an active target for consolidation and roll-up strategies.
Freight brokerage businesses are strong candidates for SBA 7(a) acquisition financing because they generate recurring service revenue, require minimal physical assets, and produce measurable EBITDA from documented shipper and carrier relationships. The SBA 7(a) loan program allows qualified buyers to finance up to 90% of the purchase price of an eligible freight brokerage, including goodwill, customer contracts, and technology infrastructure such as a transportation management system (TMS).
SBA guidelines require a minimum 10% equity injection for freight brokerage acquisitions, but most SBA lenders in the logistics space will request 15–20% when the deal involves significant goodwill relative to tangible assets.
Primary acquisition financing for freight brokerages with $500K–$2M+ in EBITDA; covers purchase price including goodwill, shipper contracts, TMS software, and working capital for carrier payment float
Smaller freight brokerage acquisitions in the $1M–$2M purchase price range where a full standard loan is not required; useful for owner-operators buying a first book of business
Working capital needs post-acquisition such as funding carrier payment cycles, onboarding technology upgrades, or bridging cash flow during shipper transition periods following a freight brokerage purchase
Before approaching lenders, establish your target profile: freight brokerages with $500K+ EBITDA, diversified shipper base with no single account exceeding 25% of net revenue, active FMCSA broker authority, and a management team or key account managers willing to stay post-close.
Not all SBA lenders understand freight brokerage financials. Identify lenders — typically Preferred Lending Partners (PLPs) or non-bank SBA lenders — who have closed logistics or service business acquisitions and can underwrite net revenue margins correctly.
Freight brokerage financials require careful reconciliation. Gross revenue includes carrier costs that are pass-through expenses; net revenue (gross margin) is the true top-line for valuation and debt service analysis.
Work with your M&A advisor or business broker to structure the acquisition with an SBA 7(a) loan covering 70–80% of the purchase price, your equity injection of 10–20%, and a seller note of 5–15% on standby.
Provide the lender with the purchase agreement, 3 years of business tax returns, recast financials showing adjusted EBITDA, a customer concentration report for the top 20 shippers, carrier network documentation, and evidence of active FMCSA broker authority and surety bond.
The most common financing tool for freight brokerage acquisitions. SBA 7(a) loans cover up to 90% of the purchase price, making them ideal for buyers acquiring an established book of business with documented net revenue and at least $500K in EBITDA.
Seller notes are commonly used in freight brokerage deals to bridge valuation gaps or reduce the SBA loan amount. The seller carries a portion of the purchase price, typically subordinated to the senior SBA lender, paid over 2–5 years.
SBA Loan Calculator
Estimate your monthly payment for a Logistics & Freight Brokerage acquisition
Standard for acquisitions
Powered by DealFlow OS
dealflow-os.com · Free M&A tools for every stage of the deal
Yes. Freight brokerages are among the most SBA-eligible service businesses for acquisition financing because they generate recurring revenue, have measurable EBITDA, and operate within a defined regulatory framework with FMCSA licensing.
Freight brokerage acquisitions in the lower middle market require deal structures that directly address the industry's most stubborn valuation risks: customer concentration, owner dependency, and freight market volatility. Unlike asset-heavy businesses, freight brokerages are sold primarily on their book of business — the shipper relationships, carrier network, and net revenue margins they generate.
The most common structure for independent buyer acquisitions of freight brokerages under $5M in enterprise value.
A strategic buyer — typically a regional 3PL, national freight broker, or PE-backed logistics roll-up — pays a significant cash component at close with the remaining portion tied to post-close performance metrics.
The seller retains a minority equity stake — typically 10–30% — in the combined or acquiring entity post-close, with the majority purchased outright by a PE-backed platform or strategic acquirer.
An earnout defers a portion of the purchase price — typically 15–30% — and pays it out over 12–24 months post-close if the business meets agreed performance targets.
Acquiring a freight brokerage in the $1M–$5M net revenue range requires diligence far beyond standard business acquisition review. Freight brokers report both gross revenue (total shipper billings) and net revenue (gross margin after carrier costs), and conflating the two is the single most common valuation error buyers make.
Spot market-heavy brokers show severe margin compression during soft freight cycles like 2023.
Freight brokers can face cash flow gaps if shipper payment terms exceed carrier payment obligations.
Identifies concentration risk and whether the top accounts are growing, stable, or declining.
Verbal or owner-relationship-based accounts may not survive a change of ownership.
Shipper retention is the single largest driver of earnout achievement and post-close value.
Overexposure to a single industry amplifies revenue risk during sector-specific downturns.
Lapsed authority or bond violations can result in immediate operational shutdown post-close.
A shallow or noncompliant carrier network creates service failures and legal liability for cargo claims.
Unresolved or recurring freight claims signal carrier vetting failures and potential hidden liabilities.
Cargo theft and double-brokering fraud risk is elevated without systematic carrier vetting protocols.
Accounts managed exclusively by one departing employee represent immediate revenue loss risk.
Departing sales staff taking shipper accounts is the most common post-close value destruction event.
An abrupt owner exit without transition support accelerates shipper and carrier relationship erosion.
Operational continuity depends on retaining experienced staff who know the carrier network and lanes.
Start by mapping every shipper account to the employee or owner who manages it day-to-day. Accounts managed exclusively by the selling owner carry the highest portability risk. Review whether written service agreements, preferred vendor status, or long-tenured volume history support retention.
An LOI in a freight brokerage acquisition is more than a price signal — it is the document that defines the commercial logic of the entire deal. Because freight brokerages are valued on net revenue (gross margin after carrier costs) rather than gross revenue, and because the business's worth is heavily concentrated in shipper relationships and carrier network depth, a poorly drafted LOI exposes the buyer to valuation disputes, key account defection, and earnout manipulation.
Identifies the acquiring entity and the selling entity with precision, and establishes whether the deal is structured as an asset purchase or stock purchase.
States the proposed purchase price and — critically in freight brokerage — defines exactly what financial metric the valuation multiple is applied to.
Defines any contingent consideration tied to post-close performance, which is standard in freight brokerage deals where a significant portion of business value depends on shipper account retention and net revenue continuity after the owner transitions out.
Establishes the due diligence period, the specific categories of information the Buyer requires, and the Seller's obligations to provide access to financial records, customer data, carrier compliance files, and technology systems.
Addresses the terms of the owner's post-close involvement, the retention of key account managers or sales staff, and the non-compete and non-solicitation obligations that protect the acquired shipper relationships and carrier network.
Establishes the working capital target at closing and clarifies the treatment of accounts receivable, carrier payables, and any outstanding freight claims, which in brokerage deals can represent significant current liabilities.
The single most important economic term in any freight brokerage LOI. Net revenue equals gross brokerage revenue minus carrier and purchased transportation costs.
If any single shipper accounts for more than 20–25% of net revenue, negotiate a price adjustment mechanism or earnout escrow tied specifically to that account's retention.
In owner-operated freight brokerages, the owner's active involvement post-close is not optional — it is the mechanism by which shipper and carrier relationships transfer to the new operator.
The Seller must represent that all carriers in the active network hold current operating authority, cargo insurance, and liability insurance meeting FMCSA minimums.
The most effective freight brokerage earnouts are tied to the retention of specific named shipper accounts and their net revenue contribution, measured at 12 and 24 months post-close using TMS-generated load data. Avoid EBITDA-based earnouts because post-close overhead allocation by the buyer can manipulate the result.
Freight brokerage is structurally positioned for consolidation. Shippers increasingly prefer working with intermediaries that can offer multi-modal capacity, lane depth, and technology-enabled visibility — capabilities that solo owner-operators struggle to deliver.
The core thesis is straightforward: acquire four to eight owner-operated freight brokers generating $500K–$1.5M in EBITDA each, consolidate them onto a shared TMS platform and compliance infrastructure, retain key sales personnel with equity incentives, and cross-sell capacity across a unified carrier network that no individual acquired entity could access alone.
No single shipper should exceed 20% of net revenue. Diverse customer tenure and contract status reduce revenue fragility and support predictable cash flow during freight market cycles.
Platform must operate on a scalable TMS — such as McLeod, MoLo, or similar — with clean data history, load board integrations, and capacity to onboard acquired brokerages without full re-implementation.
At least two senior operations or account management leaders must be capable of running day-to-day freight operations independently, reducing owner dependency and enabling post-acquisition integration.
Ideal add-ons are small owner-operated brokerages with proven shipper relationships and carrier networks that can be integrated onto the platform's TMS and back-office within 90 days.
Before pursuing acquisitions, define the geographic footprint, freight modes, and shipper verticals your platform will own. A roll-up without a coherent lane strategy results in a collection of unrelated books of business rather than a defensible platform.
Begin proprietary deal sourcing through freight broker networks, FMCSA authority databases, industry associations such as TIA, and sell-side M&A advisors with logistics specialization.
Freight brokerage due diligence requires a fundamentally different lens than most service business acquisitions. The two most critical risk factors are carrier network depth and shipper retention post-close.
The most effective deal structures in freight brokerage roll-ups tie a meaningful portion of seller consideration to post-close performance tied directly to the risks identified in diligence.
Migrating acquired brokers onto a single modern TMS platform — such as McLeod, Turvo, or a comparable system — eliminates redundant software costs, creates unified load visibility across the portfolio, and enables data-driven carrier selection that improves net margins.
The combined carrier networks of multiple acquired brokers, when centralized and cross-leveraged, provide preferred capacity access during tight freight markets that independent operators cannot match.
Freight brokerage operations — carrier invoicing, payment processing, claims management, compliance monitoring, and accounting — are highly repetitive functions that can be centralized across multiple acquired entities.
Each acquired shipper base represents a cross-selling opportunity for the broader platform's freight modes, lanes, and value-added services such as freight audit, managed transportation, or dedicated capacity programs.
In freight brokerage, gross revenue represents the total amount billed to shippers, while net revenue — also called gross margin or net revenue margin — is what remains after paying carrier costs. Since a broker might bill a shipper $10,000 for a load but pay the carrier $8,500, only the $1,500 net margin is truly the broker's revenue.
Acquiring a freight brokerage is as much about preserving relationships as it is about operational control. The first 90 days after close determine whether top shippers stay, key sales agents remain loyal, and carrier capacity holds. This guide walks acquirers through a structured integration process covering shipper communication, TMS consolidation, staff retention, and compliance validation — specific to the fragmented, relationship-driven dynamics of the freight brokerage market.
Shippers who hear about an ownership change secondhand often interpret silence as instability and begin exploring competing brokers. Proactive, personal outreach from the new owner within 48 hours of close is essential to retaining accounts.
Migrating to a new TMS before validating historical load data, carrier compliance records, and shipper billing accuracy can cause operational disruptions, missed invoices, and carrier payment delays that damage hard-earned relationships.
In freight brokerage, top agents often control shipper relationships personally. Without retention incentives and enforceable non-solicitation agreements, a departing agent can take accounts worth 20–40% of net revenue to a competing broker.
Contact top shippers personally within 48 hours of close, keep their existing account manager in place, and reaffirm pricing, service levels, and lane commitments. Shippers stay loyal to people and performance, not ownership structure.
Sellers often lead with gross revenue figures that include carrier payments. True broker economics live in net revenue — gross margin after carrier costs — which can be 15–25% of gross. Overpaying based on gross revenue is a critical error.
Many owner-operated freight brokers generate 50–70% of net revenue from three to five shippers. If a single customer exceeds 25% of revenue, departure post-close can devastate cash flow and EBITDA almost immediately.
When the seller personally manages all carrier relationships and shipper accounts, the business may not survive the transition. Key sales agents who leave post-close often take accounts with them.
A freight broker's carrier network is a core asset. Unvetted carriers, lapsed insurance certificates, or broker authority compliance gaps create legal exposure and capacity risk that buyers discover only after closing.
Buyers who acquire during a strong freight cycle often extrapolate peak EBITDA into projections. Freight markets are cyclical, and net margins compress sharply when spot rates fall and capacity loosens.
Brokerages running on spreadsheets or legacy TMS platforms without load board integration or EDI capability cannot scale. Technology gaps increase post-acquisition labor costs and limit integration into a roll-up platform.
Yes. Freight brokerages are generally SBA 7(a) eligible given their service business structure. Buyers typically put down 10–20% with a seller note filling the gap between SBA proceeds and purchase price.
Freight brokers report both gross revenue (total shipper billings) and net revenue (gross margin after carrier costs). Buyers value your business on net revenue and EBITDA — not top-line gross revenue.
Recasting adjusts your reported net income to reflect true business earnings by adding back owner compensation above market rate, personal expenses run through the business, one-time costs such as a freight claim settlement or legal dispute, and non-recurring technology migrations.
Buyers will cross-reference your accounting system against your TMS load history to verify revenue by lane, customer, and carrier. Discrepancies — even minor ones from billing timing or manual entries — create audit flags that slow diligence and erode trust.
Document each shipper account's annual net revenue contribution, tenure in years, primary lanes, contract or verbal relationship status, volume trend over 3 years, and the name of the internal employee managing the relationship.
Buyers are acquiring a business, not a person. If your top five shippers would leave when you do, the business is worth far less than your financials suggest.
Buyers will ask for monthly or quarterly load counts and net revenue by customer over 36 months.
Compile a master list of your active carriers including MC number, authority status, insurance certificate expiration dates, safety rating, and primary lanes operated.
Your FMCSA broker operating authority and $75,000 surety bond must be active and fully compliant.
Buyers want to know that your carrier network is reproducible and not dependent on your personal judgment or undocumented tribal knowledge.
Write formal SOPs covering load booking workflow, carrier dispatch and tracking, shipper billing and collections, carrier payment processing, freight claims handling, and new customer onboarding.
If you are running on an outdated TMS — or worse, a combination of spreadsheets and email — now is the time to upgrade or at minimum clean and organize your existing data.
Freight brokerages often rely on 1099 independent sales agents whose agreements may be verbal or outdated.
Misrepresenting gross revenue as EBITDA basis is common in brokerage deals and directly inflates perceived valuation, misleading buyers and lenders.
Shipper concentration risk often requires post-close earnouts; inexperienced brokers may structure deals that collapse when key accounts don't transfer.
Freight businesses require operationally capable buyers; unqualified buyers create failed closings and expose seller confidentiality unnecessarily.
Plan for 12 to 24 months from the time you begin preparation to the time proceeds hit your account. The preparation phase — recasting financials, documenting SOPs, securing non-solicitation agreements, and upgrading your TMS — typically takes 6 to 12 months.
More buying guides
For Buyers
For Sellers