Deal Structure Guide · General Contracting

How to Structure the Acquisition of a General Contracting Business

From SBA financing and seller notes to earnouts tied to backlog conversion — here is how buyers and sellers structure deals in the lower middle market general contracting space.

Acquiring a general contracting business in the $1M–$5M revenue range requires deal structures that account for the industry's unique financial characteristics: project-based revenue cycles, backlog uncertainty, retainage balances, contingent liabilities from completed work, and heavy owner dependency. Unlike a subscription software business or a service firm with predictable monthly recurring revenue, a general contracting company's future earnings are directly tied to its backlog quality, bonding capacity, and the relationships of its owner. Buyers and lenders price this risk into how they structure consideration, and sellers must understand how their business's specific profile — license transferability, client concentration, and financial documentation — affects the deal terms they can expect. The most common structures in this industry combine SBA 7(a) debt, a seller note, and in some cases an earnout tied to post-close backlog conversion or revenue milestones. Asset purchases are preferred over stock acquisitions to limit exposure to legacy project liabilities. Working capital pegs and warranty holdbacks are standard negotiating points that reflect the realities of managing ongoing projects through a transition.

Find General Contracting Businesses For Sale

SBA 7(a) Loan with Seller Note

The most common structure for lower middle market general contracting acquisitions. The buyer finances 75–80% of the purchase price through an SBA 7(a) loan, injects 10–15% equity, and the seller carries a subordinated note for the remaining 5–10%. The SBA loan is typically structured over 10 years, with the seller note on a 2–5 year term that may include a standstill period during the SBA repayment window. Lenders often require the seller to remain engaged post-close to support license transfer, client introductions, and project continuity.

75–80% SBA debt, 10–15% buyer equity, 5–10% seller note

Pros

  • Maximizes buyer leverage while keeping the seller financially invested in a successful transition
  • SBA terms (10-year amortization, fixed or variable rates) improve post-close cash flow relative to conventional debt
  • Seller note signals confidence in the business to the SBA lender and aligns seller incentives during transition

Cons

  • SBA underwriting scrutiny on backlog quality, license transferability, and bonding capacity can delay or kill deals
  • Seller must subordinate their note to SBA debt, limiting their collection rights in early years post-close
  • Personal guarantees and collateral requirements can complicate deals where business assets are primarily intangible

Best for: Entrepreneurial buyers with construction backgrounds acquiring an established general contracting firm with clean financials, a transferable license, and documented backlog of $1M or more.

Seller Financing with Earnout

In deals where SBA financing is unavailable or impractical — often due to thin EBITDA margins, undocumented financials, or a buyer without strong personal liquidity — the seller may finance a larger portion of the purchase price directly. An earnout component tied to backlog conversion, gross revenue, or EBITDA over 12–24 months post-close is common when future earnings are difficult to predict. This structure is also used to bridge valuation gaps when buyer and seller disagree on how much of the current backlog will convert to recognized revenue under new ownership.

50–70% seller note, 20–30% buyer equity or down payment, 10–20% earnout tied to performance milestones

Pros

  • Allows deals to close when traditional bank financing is unavailable due to financial documentation gaps
  • Earnout aligns seller incentives with post-close performance and protects buyer from overpaying for projected backlog
  • Flexible structure accommodates sellers who prefer installment payments for tax efficiency

Cons

  • Earnout disputes are common in project-based businesses where revenue recognition timing is subjective
  • Seller retains significant credit risk with limited recourse if the buyer mismanages the business post-close
  • Lack of third-party lender discipline can result in looser due diligence and higher post-close risk for both parties

Best for: Situations where the seller has strong client relationships that require a longer transition, financials need normalization, or the parties need to bridge a valuation gap around uncertain future backlog.

Asset Purchase with Working Capital Peg and Warranty Holdback

Regardless of how the purchase price is financed, the majority of general contracting acquisitions are structured as asset purchases rather than stock purchases. The buyer acquires specific assets — equipment, contracts, customer relationships, trade name, and goodwill — while the seller retains pre-close liabilities including completed project warranty claims, unresolved mechanic's liens, and any pending litigation. A working capital peg establishes a target level of net working capital (typically accounts receivable minus accounts payable, excluding retainage) to be delivered at close, and a holdback of 5–10% of the purchase price is escrowed for 12–18 months to cover warranty claims and retainage shortfalls on projects completed pre-close.

90–95% paid at close, 5–10% held in escrow for 12–18 months for warranty and retainage resolution

Pros

  • Buyer avoids inheriting legacy liabilities from completed projects, subcontractor disputes, or undisclosed liens
  • Working capital peg ensures the buyer receives a business capable of operating from day one without additional capital injection
  • Holdback mechanism creates a clear, agreed-upon process for resolving post-close claims without renegotiating the deal

Cons

  • Asset purchase structure may trigger license reapplication requirements in states where the GC license is held by the legal entity
  • Negotiating the working capital peg can be contentious when retainage receivables and billing-in-excess positions are large
  • Sellers may resist holdback terms that feel punitive, particularly when warranty claim probability is low

Best for: Any acquisition where the seller has completed projects still within warranty periods, open retainage balances, or any history of subcontractor or owner disputes on prior jobs.

Sample Deal Structures

SBA-Financed Acquisition of a Residential General Contractor with Clean Backlog

$2,400,000

SBA 7(a) loan: $1,920,000 (80%) | Buyer equity injection: $300,000 (12.5%) | Seller note: $180,000 (7.5%)

SBA loan at 10-year term, fully amortizing, current rate approximately prime plus 2.75%. Seller note at 6% interest over 5 years with a 24-month standstill during SBA repayment period. Seller remains engaged as a paid consultant for 12 months to support client transitions and subcontractor introductions. Working capital peg set at $280,000 based on trailing 6-month average. Holdback of $120,000 (5%) held in escrow for 18 months to cover warranty claims on projects completed in the 24 months prior to close.

Seller-Financed Deal with Earnout Tied to Backlog Conversion

$1,800,000 base plus up to $300,000 earnout

Buyer down payment: $450,000 (25%) | Seller note: $1,350,000 (75% of base price) | Earnout: up to $300,000 paid over 24 months

Seller note at 7% interest over 7 years, secured by business assets and a personal guarantee from buyer. Earnout structured as 10% of gross revenue recognized from contracts in the backlog as of the close date, paid quarterly for 24 months post-close, capped at $300,000. Asset purchase structure with seller retaining all pre-close project liabilities. No working capital peg given seller financing flexibility, but a $90,000 holdback for 12 months covers open retainage and punch list items on three commercial projects still in warranty period.

Private Equity Platform Acquisition of a Commercial General Contractor

$4,200,000

Senior bank debt (conventional): $2,520,000 (60%) | PE equity: $1,260,000 (30%) | Seller rollover equity: $420,000 (10%)

Seller rolls 10% of proceeds into equity in the acquiring platform entity, aligning incentives for a 3–5 year hold. Senior debt structured as a 5-year term loan with a springing cash flow sweep if EBITDA falls below a coverage threshold. Asset purchase with a negotiated working capital peg of $420,000 (approximately 45 days of normalized revenue). Seller remains as VP of Operations for 24 months under an employment agreement. No earnout, but a $200,000 holdback escrowed for 18 months tied to resolution of two open mechanic's lien notices on prior commercial projects.

Negotiation Tips for General Contracting Deals

  • 1Tie any earnout directly to backlog conversion, not total revenue — in a project-based business, new revenue signed post-close by the buyer should not count toward a seller's earnout calculation, and the definition of 'recognized revenue from existing contracts' must be precisely drafted before close.
  • 2Negotiate license transferability before finalizing structure — if the GC license is held personally by the seller and the target state requires a new application rather than a transfer, the deal timeline and bonding continuity plan must be restructured accordingly, as this affects lender and surety approvals.
  • 3Require a detailed retainage aging schedule as part of due diligence and establish a specific retainage collection mechanism in the purchase agreement — retainage that is 90-plus days outstanding on completed projects should either be excluded from working capital targets or discounted in the purchase price.
  • 4Push for a comprehensive completed operations insurance tail policy paid by the seller at close — this policy should cover warranty and liability claims arising from projects completed in the 24–36 months prior to close, protecting the buyer from legacy exposure that is difficult to quantify during diligence.
  • 5Build subcontractor and supplier relationship transfer into the transition plan and employment agreement, not just the LOI — key subcontractors who are accustomed to working exclusively with the owner should be introduced to new ownership before close, and any exclusivity or preferred pricing arrangements should be documented and confirmed in writing.
  • 6When using an SBA 7(a) loan, engage your lender early on bonding continuity — surety companies treat ownership changes as triggering events that can reduce or eliminate bonding capacity, so coordinating with the surety during the SBA underwriting process prevents a scenario where the loan closes but the company cannot bid new commercial projects.

Find General Contracting Businesses For Sale

Pre-screened targets ready for your deal structure — free to join.

Get Deal Flow

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the typical purchase price multiple for a general contracting business in the lower middle market?

General contracting businesses in the $1M–$5M revenue range typically trade at 2.5x to 4.5x EBITDA. Where a specific company lands in that range depends on backlog quality and diversification, owner dependency, license and bonding transferability, financial documentation quality, and whether the business has an experienced management team capable of operating without the seller. A company with signed contracts representing 9-plus months of forward revenue, a clean bonding history, and a project manager who can run operations independently will command multiples at the higher end. A single-owner shop with concentrated clients and informal bookkeeping will trade closer to 2.5x.

Can I use an SBA loan to buy a general contracting business?

Yes. General contracting businesses are eligible for SBA 7(a) financing, and this is the most common debt structure for lower middle market acquisitions in this sector. The SBA lender will underwrite the business based on historical cash flow, backlog quality, and the buyer's industry experience. Key SBA-specific considerations for construction acquisitions include license transferability (the lender needs confidence the business can operate legally under new ownership), bonding capacity continuity, and whether the seller is willing to carry a subordinated note, which many SBA lenders require as evidence of seller confidence in the business.

Why is an asset purchase preferred over a stock purchase for acquiring a general contracting company?

In a general contracting business, the completed operations liability — meaning claims arising from projects finished before the sale — can be significant and difficult to quantify. Subcontractor disputes, mechanic's liens, warranty callbacks, and litigation from prior projects are common in the industry. An asset purchase allows the buyer to acquire only the specified assets (equipment, contracts, trade name, goodwill, and customer relationships) without inheriting the seller's corporate history and its associated liabilities. A stock purchase would expose the buyer to all pre-close obligations, including undisclosed claims. Note that asset purchases can complicate license transfers in some states, so legal counsel with construction industry M&A experience should review the structure before signing a letter of intent.

How should retainage be handled in a general contracting acquisition?

Retainage — typically 5–10% of contract value withheld by the project owner until substantial completion — is one of the most negotiated items in a general contracting deal. Buyers and sellers must agree on how outstanding retainage receivables are treated in the working capital peg, whether pre-close retainage that is collected post-close flows to the buyer or the seller, and how retainage on projects still in progress at the time of close is allocated. A common approach is to include a retainage schedule in the purchase agreement that specifies which retainage balances belong to each party based on the milestone that triggers collection, with a collection agent or holdback mechanism managing disputes.

What is an earnout and when does it make sense in a general contracting deal?

An earnout is a contingent component of the purchase price paid to the seller after close based on the business achieving specified financial milestones. In general contracting, earnouts are most commonly tied to backlog conversion — that is, revenue recognized from contracts that were signed before the close date — or to gross revenue or EBITDA targets in the 12–24 months post-close. Earnouts make sense when buyer and seller disagree on valuation due to backlog uncertainty, when the seller's personal relationships are critical to retaining clients and projects, or when historical financials are inconsistent and the seller believes forward performance will justify a higher price. The risk is that earnout disputes in project-based businesses are common due to the subjectivity of revenue recognition timing, so precise definitions and measurement mechanics are essential.

How does the seller's general contractor license affect the deal structure?

This is one of the most critical deal-specific factors in a general contracting acquisition. In most states, a general contractor license is held either by an individual qualifier or by the business entity. If the license is held personally by the seller and the target state requires the new owner to obtain a new license or designate a new qualifier, there may be a gap period during which the company cannot legally pull permits or bid new work. This affects the deal timeline, the transition plan, and potentially the purchase price. Buyers should confirm license transferability with a construction attorney before signing an LOI, and sellers should proactively assess whether they have licensed employees who can serve as the qualifying party under new ownership.

More General Contracting Guides

More Deal Structure Guides

Start Finding General Contracting Deals Today — Free to Join

Find the right target, structure the deal, and close with confidence.

Create your free account

No credit card required