A practical, manufacturing-specific LOI guide covering equipment valuation, customer concentration, earnouts, and SBA deal structures — built for $1M–$5M revenue manufacturers.
A Letter of Intent (LOI) is the critical first formal step in acquiring or selling a manufacturing business. It establishes the purchase price, deal structure, key conditions, and exclusivity period before either party invests heavily in due diligence and legal fees. In the lower middle market manufacturing sector — where deals often hinge on equipment condition, customer contract durability, and workforce retention — a well-drafted LOI can prevent costly misunderstandings and set the tone for a smooth closing. This guide walks through every section of a manufacturing LOI, with specific language examples, negotiation considerations, and the most common mistakes buyers and sellers make. Whether you are acquiring a precision machining shop with government contracts or selling a contract manufacturer serving OEM customers, this template gives you a strong starting point for structuring a defensible offer.
Find Manufacturing Businesses to AcquireParties and Business Identification
Identifies the buyer entity, seller entity, and the specific business being acquired — including legal name, operating name, physical location of facilities, and a brief description of the manufacturing operation.
Example Language
This Letter of Intent ('LOI') is entered into as of [Date] between [Buyer Legal Entity], a [State] [LLC/Corporation] ('Buyer'), and [Seller Legal Name] ('Seller'), the owner of [Business Legal Name] d/b/a [Operating Name], a [State] [LLC/Corporation] engaged in [e.g., precision contract machining and custom metal fabrication] operating from facilities located at [Street Address, City, State, ZIP] ('the Company').
💡 Buyers should confirm early whether they are acquiring assets or equity, as this affects which entity is named as the acquiring party. Sellers should ensure the correct legal entity is identified — particularly important if production equipment, real estate, or IP are held in separate holding companies, which is common in family-owned manufacturers.
Proposed Purchase Price and Valuation Basis
States the total proposed enterprise value, the basis for that valuation (typically a multiple of normalized EBITDA), and any preliminary assumptions about working capital, inventory, and equipment being included in the transaction price.
Example Language
Buyer proposes to acquire 100% of the assets of the Company for a total purchase price of approximately $[X,XXX,000] ('Purchase Price'), representing approximately [4.0x–4.5x] the Company's trailing twelve-month normalized EBITDA of $[XXX,000], as represented by Seller. The Purchase Price assumes the inclusion of all production equipment, tooling, intellectual property, customer contracts, and trade accounts receivable, and a normalized level of raw material inventory valued at approximately $[XXX,000]. The final Purchase Price will be subject to adjustment based on findings from financial, equipment, and operational due diligence.
💡 Manufacturing valuations in the $1M–$5M revenue range typically trade at 3.5x–5.5x EBITDA. Buyers should explicitly state what is included — especially equipment and inventory — to avoid disputes at closing. Sellers should confirm whether real estate is included in the enterprise value or treated as a separate lease or purchase. Buyers relying on SBA 7(a) financing should note that the lender will require an independent equipment appraisal and business valuation, which may affect the final price.
Deal Structure and Financing
Outlines how the transaction will be funded — including SBA loan proceeds, buyer equity injection, seller financing, and any earnout component — and the anticipated ownership structure at closing.
Example Language
Buyer intends to finance the acquisition through a combination of: (i) an SBA 7(a) loan of approximately $[X,XXX,000] through [Lender Name or 'a qualified SBA lender']; (ii) a buyer equity injection of approximately $[XXX,000], representing not less than 10% of total project costs; and (iii) a seller note of approximately $[XXX,000], subordinated to the SBA loan, bearing interest at [6–7]% per annum, with a [24–60]-month repayment term on standby during the SBA loan period. Any earnout component is described in Section [X] below.
💡 SBA lenders will scrutinize customer concentration heavily in manufacturing acquisitions — a single customer representing more than 20–25% of revenue may trigger additional conditions or affect loan approval. Sellers should understand that a seller note in an SBA deal is often placed on full standby for 24 months. Buyers should be transparent about SBA pre-qualification status to avoid losing time in exclusivity on deals they cannot finance.
Earnout Provisions
Describes any contingent consideration tied to the Company's post-closing financial performance — common in manufacturing deals where the seller's relationships or proprietary knowledge are central to revenue continuity.
Example Language
In addition to the base Purchase Price, Buyer agrees to pay Seller an earnout of up to $[XXX,000] over [24] months post-closing, structured as follows: (i) $[XXX,000] if the Company achieves trailing twelve-month revenue of not less than $[X,XXX,000] measured at the 12-month anniversary of closing; and (ii) $[XXX,000] if the Company achieves trailing twelve-month EBITDA of not less than $[XXX,000] measured at the 24-month anniversary of closing. Earnout calculations will be based on GAAP-compliant financial statements prepared by the Company's accountant and subject to Buyer's reasonable review.
💡 Earnouts are common in manufacturing acquisitions where the seller is the primary relationship holder with key OEM or government contract customers. Sellers should negotiate for revenue-based rather than EBITDA-based earnout metrics wherever possible, as buyers have more control over cost allocation post-closing. Buyers should ensure the earnout agreement includes anti-sandbagging provisions and clear accounting methodology to prevent disputes. Both parties should agree on how order backlog fluctuations, raw material price swings, or equipment downtime are treated in earnout calculations.
Due Diligence Scope and Timeline
Defines the scope of buyer's due diligence investigation, the documentation Seller must provide, and the timeline for completing due diligence before the LOI expires or a definitive agreement is executed.
Example Language
Following Seller's execution of this LOI, Buyer shall have [45–60] calendar days ('Due Diligence Period') to conduct a comprehensive review of the Company, including but not limited to: (i) three years of financial statements and tax returns, including a normalized EBITDA reconciliation; (ii) a complete equipment list with age, maintenance history, and any pending capital expenditure requirements; (iii) all customer contracts, purchase orders, and concentration analysis by customer; (iv) all supplier agreements and single-source dependency disclosures; (v) workforce roster, compensation structure, union agreements if applicable, and key employee retention arrangements; (vi) environmental compliance records, OSHA logs, and any pending regulatory matters; and (vii) all intellectual property, certifications (ISO, AS9100, ITAR), and proprietary tooling documentation.
💡 Manufacturing due diligence timelines frequently extend beyond initial estimates due to equipment appraisal scheduling and environmental review complexity. Buyers should build in a 10–15 day extension right. Sellers should prepare a due diligence data room in advance, including maintenance logs, customer purchase order history, and certification documentation, to accelerate the process and signal operational credibility.
Exclusivity Period
Grants the buyer an exclusive negotiating window during which the seller agrees not to solicit, entertain, or accept competing offers — protecting the buyer's investment in due diligence and legal costs.
Example Language
In consideration of Buyer's commitment of time and resources to due diligence, Seller agrees to grant Buyer an exclusive negotiating period of [60] calendar days from the date of this LOI ('Exclusivity Period'). During the Exclusivity Period, Seller shall not, directly or indirectly, solicit, initiate, or engage in discussions with any other potential buyer, investment banker, or business broker regarding a sale, merger, recapitalization, or other disposition of the Company or its assets.
💡 Sixty days is a reasonable exclusivity window for a manufacturing acquisition of this size, given the time required for equipment appraisals, environmental assessments, and SBA lender approval. Sellers should resist exclusivity periods longer than 75 days without a hard closing deadline. Buyers should include a right to extend exclusivity by 15–30 days if SBA processing or third-party appraisals are delayed, subject to seller consent.
Conditions to Closing
Lists the material conditions that must be satisfied before the transaction can close, protecting both parties from being obligated to proceed if key facts change or cannot be verified.
Example Language
The obligations of Buyer to consummate the transaction are conditioned upon, among other things: (i) satisfactory completion of due diligence with no material adverse findings related to equipment condition, customer concentration, or environmental liability; (ii) receipt of SBA 7(a) loan approval on terms acceptable to Buyer; (iii) execution of a definitive Asset Purchase Agreement with representations, warranties, and indemnification provisions satisfactory to both parties; (iv) retention of key employees as identified during due diligence, including [production manager, lead machinist, or other critical roles]; (v) assignment or novation of all material customer contracts and supplier agreements; and (vi) delivery of all required regulatory, environmental, and certification transfers in good standing.
💡 Key employee retention is frequently the most contested closing condition in owner-operated manufacturing businesses. Buyers should identify no more than three to five truly critical employees and negotiate retention bonuses funded from the purchase price. Sellers should resist broad 'material adverse change' language that could give buyers an exit on minor fluctuations in order backlog or raw material costs.
Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure
Affirms the confidentiality obligations of both parties regarding information exchanged during the LOI and due diligence process, typically referencing a separately executed NDA.
Example Language
The terms of this LOI, and all information exchanged in connection with the proposed transaction, shall be treated as strictly confidential by both parties pursuant to the Non-Disclosure Agreement executed by the parties on [Date] ('NDA'). Neither party shall disclose the existence or terms of this LOI or the proposed transaction to any third party — including employees, customers, or suppliers — without the prior written consent of the other party, except as required to obtain financing, legal, or accounting advice from advisors bound by equivalent confidentiality obligations.
💡 Confidentiality is especially sensitive in manufacturing transactions where customer relationships and supplier contracts could be jeopardized by premature disclosure. Sellers should be particularly cautious about buyers contacting key customers or employees before closing without explicit consent. Buyers should ensure their SBA lender and M&A attorney are already bound by NDAs before sharing any confidential financial or operational data.
Non-Binding Nature and Binding Provisions
Clarifies which sections of the LOI are legally binding (typically exclusivity, confidentiality, and break-up fee provisions) and which are non-binding expressions of intent subject to definitive agreement.
Example Language
Except for the provisions of Sections [Exclusivity], [Confidentiality], [Break-Up Fee], and [Governing Law], which shall be legally binding on the parties, this LOI is non-binding and constitutes only a statement of the parties' current intentions with respect to the proposed transaction. No binding obligation to consummate the transaction shall arise unless and until the parties execute a definitive Asset Purchase Agreement containing terms and conditions mutually acceptable to both parties.
💡 Buyers and sellers often underestimate the importance of clearly delineating binding versus non-binding provisions. In manufacturing deals, the binding exclusivity provision is the most commercially significant — sellers should ensure it is time-limited and paired with a buyer's obligation to provide good-faith updates on SBA approval or due diligence progress.
Break-Up Fee
Specifies a fee payable by the buyer if they terminate the transaction without cause after the exclusivity period begins, compensating the seller for lost time and opportunity cost.
Example Language
In the event Buyer terminates this LOI or fails to proceed to a definitive agreement for reasons other than (i) a material adverse finding in due diligence or (ii) failure to obtain SBA financing despite good-faith efforts, Buyer agrees to pay Seller a break-up fee of $[XX,000] as liquidated damages and sole remedy for such termination. This provision shall survive termination of the LOI.
💡 Break-up fees in lower middle market manufacturing deals typically range from $10,000 to $50,000, depending on deal size. Sellers should push for a break-up fee to deter buyers who tie up the business without serious intent. Buyers should carve out SBA financing failure and material due diligence discoveries — particularly environmental liabilities or undisclosed equipment condition issues — as permissible no-fee exit ramps.
Purchase Price Adjustments for Equipment Condition
Manufacturing acquisitions frequently surface deferred maintenance, aging equipment, or near-term capital expenditure requirements during due diligence that were not reflected in the initial offer. Buyers should negotiate the right to reduce the purchase price dollar-for-dollar for any equipment replacement or major repair costs identified by an independent appraiser, particularly for CNC machines, presses, kilns, or other capital-intensive assets with remaining useful life below five years.
Customer Concentration Threshold and Earnout Triggers
If a single customer represents more than 20% of revenue, buyers should negotiate either a price reduction or an earnout structure where a portion of the purchase price is contingent on that customer remaining active post-closing. Sellers should push back by offering assignment of multi-year purchase orders or master supply agreements as evidence of contract durability, and by limiting earnout risk to revenue shortfalls directly attributable to customer loss rather than market conditions.
Inventory Valuation Methodology
Raw material inventory, work-in-process, and finished goods must be valued using a consistent methodology — typically at cost or net realizable value. In manufacturing deals, obsolete or slow-moving inventory and customer-owned tooling held at the facility can inflate stated inventory values. Buyers should negotiate a physical inventory count at or near closing, with price adjustments for any variance from the represented value exceeding an agreed threshold (e.g., 5% of total inventory value).
Seller Transition and Non-Compete Agreement
In owner-operated manufacturers where the seller holds key customer relationships or proprietary process knowledge, buyers should negotiate a transition services period of six to twelve months and a non-compete agreement of three to five years covering the Company's specific niche, product lines, and geographic market. Sellers should negotiate for fair compensation for the transition period and limit the non-compete scope to avoid restrictions on genuinely unrelated business activities.
Environmental and Regulatory Representations
Manufacturing facilities carry environmental risk — including soil contamination, hazardous material storage, and OSHA compliance history — that can create significant post-closing liability. Buyers should negotiate robust seller representations and warranties covering environmental compliance, with indemnification obligations that survive closing for three to five years and are backed by escrow or a seller note holdback. Sellers with clean Phase I environmental reports should use them proactively to limit indemnification scope and duration.
Key Employee Retention and Earnout Funding
Skilled machinists, production supervisors, quality control personnel, and engineers are often the most difficult talent to replace in niche manufacturing businesses. Buyers should negotiate retention agreements for two to five critical employees, funded by a portion of the purchase price held in escrow or paid directly as signing bonuses at closing. Sellers should ensure that key employee retention is treated as a buyer obligation — not a condition that allows the buyer to walk away — since the seller has limited control over employee decisions after signing.
Find Manufacturing Businesses to Acquire
Enough information to write a strong LOI on day one — free to join.
Most LOI provisions — including the proposed purchase price, deal structure, and due diligence terms — are non-binding expressions of intent. However, three provisions are typically made legally binding in manufacturing LOIs: the exclusivity clause (preventing the seller from shopping the deal during due diligence), the confidentiality obligations (protecting sensitive financial, customer, and operational data), and any agreed break-up fee. Both buyers and sellers should have an M&A attorney review the LOI before signing to confirm which provisions carry legal enforceability.
For lower middle market manufacturing deals in the $1M–$5M revenue range, exclusivity periods typically run 45 to 75 days. This window must accommodate financial due diligence, an independent equipment appraisal (which can take two to three weeks to schedule and complete), Phase I environmental review, and SBA lender processing if applicable. Buyers relying on SBA 7(a) financing should negotiate a right to extend exclusivity by 15 to 30 days if the lender's timeline slips, subject to seller consent and demonstrated good-faith progress.
The LOI should specify whether all production equipment, tooling, and fixtures are included in the purchase price, and whether the price is subject to adjustment based on an independent equipment appraisal. It should also clarify the treatment of customer-owned tooling held at the facility — which is excluded from the sale — and any equipment under lease or financing arrangements. Buyers should avoid locking in a final purchase price before the equipment appraisal is complete, and should negotiate a price reduction mechanism if the appraised value comes in materially below the assumed value.
Revenue-based earnouts are generally more seller-friendly in manufacturing deals because they are less susceptible to buyer cost manipulation post-closing. EBITDA-based earnouts can work but require very clear accounting methodology and cost allocation rules. Earnouts tied to customer retention — for example, a payment if a key OEM customer extends or renews a supply contract within 24 months of closing — can bridge valuation gaps when customer concentration is high. Earnout periods in manufacturing typically run 12 to 36 months and should include clear measurement dates, reporting obligations, and dispute resolution mechanisms.
Yes, SBA 7(a) loans are widely used to finance manufacturing acquisitions in the $1M–$5M range and are well-suited to asset-heavy businesses with tangible collateral. The LOI should acknowledge SBA financing as the intended funding source and include SBA approval as a condition to closing. Key LOI implications include: the seller note must be placed on standby for up to 24 months per SBA guidelines, an independent business valuation and equipment appraisal are required by the lender, and customer concentration above 20–25% of revenue may prompt additional SBA underwriting scrutiny or conditions. Buyers should obtain SBA pre-qualification before issuing an LOI to avoid tying up the seller during a process they ultimately cannot finance.
Environmental findings — including soil contamination, improper hazardous waste storage, or OSHA violations — can materially affect deal terms or kill the transaction. If a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment reveals recognized environmental conditions, a Phase II assessment (soil and groundwater sampling) will typically be required before a lender will fund. If contamination is confirmed, buyers have several options: renegotiating the purchase price downward to reflect remediation costs, requiring the seller to remediate as a condition of closing, establishing an environmental indemnity escrow from the seller's proceeds, or walking away under due diligence contingency protections. These scenarios should be anticipated in the LOI by including environmental compliance as a specific closing condition and seller representation.
More Manufacturing Guides
More LOI Templates
Get enough diligence data to write a confident LOI from day one.
Create your free accountNo credit card required
For Buyers
For Sellers