A 3PL-specific LOI guide covering purchase price structures, earnouts tied to revenue retention, carrier relationship transition terms, and key negotiation points for freight brokerage and managed logistics acquisitions in the lower middle market.
A Letter of Intent (LOI) is the critical bridge between initial interest and formal due diligence in a 3PL acquisition. Unlike a simple handshake agreement, a well-drafted LOI for a freight brokerage or logistics provider must address the unique risks of this industry: customer concentration, the owner's personal carrier relationships, revenue quality between contracted and spot freight, and technology infrastructure gaps. For buyers using SBA financing, the LOI often serves as the primary document submitted to lenders before a full purchase agreement is drafted. In the $1M–$5M revenue 3PL market — where most sellers are founder-operators with 10–25 years of embedded relationships — the LOI sets the tone for trust, protects both parties during exclusivity, and surfaces deal-critical issues before legal fees escalate. This guide walks through each section of a 3PL LOI, provides realistic example language, and flags the negotiation points that most commonly derail deals in freight and logistics transactions.
Find Third-Party Logistics (3PL) Businesses to AcquirePurchase Price and Valuation Basis
Establishes the proposed purchase price, the EBITDA multiple applied, and how the seller's stated financials have been interpreted. In 3PL acquisitions, buyers should explicitly state which revenue streams were included in EBITDA normalization — contract freight, managed transportation, and spot brokerage are treated differently by lenders and buyers alike. Most lower middle market 3PL deals close at 3.5x–6x EBITDA depending on customer diversification, contract quality, and technology infrastructure.
Example Language
Buyer proposes to acquire 100% of the equity interests of [Company Name] ('the Company') for a total purchase price of $[X], representing approximately [X]x the Company's trailing twelve-month normalized EBITDA of $[X], as derived from financial statements for fiscal years [YYYY]–[YYYY]. This valuation reflects contract-based revenue of $[X] and excludes from EBITDA normalization approximately $[X] in spot freight volume that Buyer has treated as non-recurring. Purchase price is subject to adjustment pending confirmatory due diligence of revenue quality, customer contract terms, and technology infrastructure.
💡 Sellers frequently disagree on how spot freight revenue is characterized — push to define clearly which revenue tiers count toward EBITDA. If the seller's financials are cash-basis, build in language allowing for accrual restatement before price is finalized. Buyers should also confirm whether owner compensation add-backs are reasonable for the market, as 3PL owners often run significant personal expenses through the business.
Deal Structure and Sources of Funds
Outlines how the acquisition will be funded, including equity, SBA debt, seller notes, and any earnout components. 3PL acquisitions are frequently SBA 7(a) eligible, making the seller note structure and standby provisions a key negotiating point. Most deals in this market involve a combination of buyer equity (10–15%), SBA financing (75–80%), and a seller note (5–10%) that may need to be on full standby for 24 months per SBA guidelines.
Example Language
The proposed transaction will be funded as follows: (i) Buyer equity contribution of approximately $[X] (representing [X]% of purchase price); (ii) SBA 7(a) loan proceeds of approximately $[X] through [Lender Name or TBD]; and (iii) a Seller Note in the amount of $[X], bearing interest at [X]% per annum, with a [X]-year term, to be subordinated to senior SBA debt and subject to a 24-month full standby period as required by SBA guidelines. Buyer will submit a complete SBA loan application within [15] business days of LOI execution and will provide Seller with lender commitment letters or status updates within [30] days.
💡 Sellers should confirm SBA standby requirements before assuming the seller note will generate early cash flow. If the seller needs liquidity, negotiate a higher cash-at-close component even if the total price is slightly lower. Buyers should also clarify whether an earnout is additive to the stated purchase price or a portion of it — this distinction significantly affects seller expectations.
Earnout Structure
Defines any performance-based contingent consideration tied to post-close business performance. In 3PL acquisitions, earnouts are commonly structured around revenue retention from the top customer accounts, gross margin maintenance on contract lanes, or EBITDA growth targets over 12–24 months. Earnouts are particularly relevant when the seller holds personal relationships with key shippers or carriers that the buyer cannot fully verify will transfer.
Example Language
Buyer proposes an earnout of up to $[X], payable over [24] months following the close of the transaction, calculated as follows: (i) $[X] payable if aggregate revenue from the Company's top [10] customers as of the closing date equals or exceeds [85]% of their respective trailing twelve-month revenue during the first 12 months post-close; and (ii) $[X] payable if the Company achieves EBITDA of no less than $[X] during months 13–24 post-close. Earnout payments shall be made within [45] days following the end of each measurement period, and Buyer shall provide Seller with monthly financial reporting sufficient to verify earnout performance.
💡 Sellers should resist earnouts tied solely to metrics within the buyer's operational control post-close. Negotiate for revenue retention metrics tied to specific named accounts rather than broad EBITDA targets that buyers can influence through overhead allocation. Buyers should include a carve-out for customer attrition caused by events outside either party's control, such as a major shipper bankruptcy or force majeure supply chain disruption.
Exclusivity and No-Shop Period
Grants the buyer an exclusive negotiating period during which the seller agrees not to solicit or entertain offers from other parties. In 3PL transactions, 45–60 days is standard given the complexity of diligence around carrier networks, TMS infrastructure, and customer contract reviews. Sellers with multiple interested parties should negotiate a shorter window or milestone-based extension triggers.
Example Language
Upon execution of this LOI, Seller agrees to negotiate exclusively with Buyer for a period of [60] calendar days ('Exclusivity Period'). During the Exclusivity Period, Seller shall not solicit, encourage, or enter into discussions with any third party regarding the sale of the Company or its assets. This exclusivity period may be extended by mutual written agreement if both parties are actively engaged in due diligence and financing processes. Buyer agrees to provide Seller with a written due diligence status update no later than [30] days following LOI execution confirming progress toward financing commitment.
💡 Sellers should insist on a buyer milestone requirement — if the buyer has not submitted SBA loan documents or delivered a due diligence request list within 15 days, the seller should retain the right to terminate exclusivity. Buyers should avoid agreeing to open-ended extensions and instead negotiate a defined timeline with clear deliverables on both sides.
Due Diligence Scope and Access
Defines the categories of information the buyer requires and the process for accessing them. For 3PL acquisitions, due diligence must specifically address customer contracts and renewal terms, carrier relationship documentation, TMS and WMS system access, revenue breakdown by service type, and key employee retention. This section prevents scope disputes during the diligence phase and signals to the seller which areas the buyer considers highest risk.
Example Language
Buyer's obligation to proceed to closing is contingent upon satisfactory completion of due diligence, including but not limited to: (i) review of three years of financial statements and tax returns with revenue segmented by customer and service line (contract, managed, spot); (ii) review of all customer contracts, service level agreements, pricing schedules, and renewal or termination provisions; (iii) evaluation of the Company's technology infrastructure including TMS and WMS platforms, EDI integrations, and associated licensing and vendor agreements; (iv) review of carrier relationship agreements, capacity commitments, and rate structures for the Company's top 20 carrier partners; (v) assessment of key employee agreements, compensation structures, non-solicitation provisions, and retention risk; and (vi) review of any pending litigation, regulatory matters, or FMCSA compliance issues. Seller agrees to provide access to a secure data room within [10] business days of LOI execution.
💡 Buyers should resist vague due diligence language that allows sellers to provide summary documents rather than underlying contracts. Specifically request carrier rate confirmation letters and customer renewal correspondence — verbal commitments are common in freight brokerage and will not hold up post-close. Sellers should negotiate that due diligence findings must be material and quantified to support a price reduction, preventing buyers from using minor findings as leverage to renegotiate.
Transition and Seller Consulting Agreement
Outlines the seller's post-close role in transitioning customer and carrier relationships to the buyer or a designated management team. This section is especially critical in owner-operated 3PLs where the founder personally manages relationships with top shippers and asset-based carriers. A structured transition reduces key-person risk and is often required by SBA lenders.
Example Language
Seller agrees to remain available as a consultant to Buyer for a period of [12] months following the closing date at a rate of $[X] per month, during which time Seller will assist with the introduction and transfer of customer and carrier relationships, participation in at least [X] in-person or virtual meetings with the Company's top [10] customers, and orientation of Buyer or designated management on operational workflows, carrier negotiation practices, and TMS platform usage. Seller's consulting obligations shall not exceed [X] hours per month and shall be subject to a mutually agreed-upon transition plan to be finalized no later than [30] days prior to closing.
💡 Buyers should tie a portion of the earnout or seller note to active and good-faith participation in the transition plan — passive consulting agreements rarely result in effective relationship transfers. Sellers should negotiate a cap on hours, a clear scope of required activities, and indemnification against post-close liabilities arising from decisions made exclusively by the buyer after the transition period ends.
Representations, Warranties, and Indemnification Caps
Establishes the seller's factual claims about the business and the limits of financial exposure if those claims prove false post-close. In 3PL acquisitions, key representations cover accuracy of customer contracts, carrier agreement status, technology ownership or licensing rights, absence of undisclosed shipper or carrier disputes, and FMCSA or DOT compliance where applicable.
Example Language
Seller represents and warrants that: (i) all customer contracts provided during due diligence are complete, in full force, and not subject to any pending termination or dispute; (ii) the Company is in material compliance with all applicable FMCSA, DOT, and state transportation regulations; (iii) no single customer accounted for more than [X]% of revenue during the trailing twelve months without disclosure to Buyer; (iv) the TMS and WMS platforms currently in use are properly licensed and not subject to pending expiration or renegotiation; and (v) the Company has no undisclosed carrier disputes, cargo claims in excess of $[X], or pending litigation. Seller's aggregate indemnification liability shall not exceed [X]% of the final purchase price, with a deductible of $[X] and a survival period of [24] months from closing.
💡 Buyers in 3PL deals should specifically negotiate a carve-out from the indemnification cap for fraud and intentional misrepresentation, particularly around customer concentration disclosures. Sellers should push for a basket deductible of 0.5–1% of purchase price to avoid being exposed to minor post-close claims. Representation and warranty insurance is available for deals above $5M but is rarely cost-effective for smaller 3PL transactions.
Working Capital and Balance Sheet Adjustments
Defines the working capital target and how the purchase price will be adjusted if the delivered working capital at close differs from the normalized target. In freight brokerage and 3PL businesses, working capital management is particularly important given the receivables-heavy nature of operations, where shippers may pay on 30–60 day terms while carriers must be paid within 30 days.
Example Language
The purchase price assumes delivery of a normalized net working capital of $[X] ('NWC Target'), calculated as current assets minus current liabilities excluding cash and interest-bearing debt, measured as of the closing date. If the delivered NWC is less than the NWC Target by more than $[X] (the 'Collar'), the purchase price shall be reduced dollar-for-dollar by the deficiency. If the delivered NWC exceeds the NWC Target by more than $[X], the purchase price shall be increased accordingly. A preliminary NWC calculation shall be provided by Seller no fewer than [5] business days prior to closing, with a final true-up to occur within [60] days post-close.
💡 Buyers should verify that the NWC Target accounts for the Company's actual cash conversion cycle — 3PL businesses with slow-paying shipper accounts and fast-pay carrier obligations can have structurally negative working capital that inflates the seller's stated NWC. Sellers should ensure the NWC Target is based on a trailing 12-month average rather than a snapshot, as freight seasonality can cause significant monthly variation in receivables and payables.
Revenue Quality Definition and Spot Freight Exclusion
Buyers and sellers frequently disagree on whether spot freight brokerage volume should be included in the EBITDA calculation used to set purchase price. Negotiate a clear written definition distinguishing contract and managed freight revenue (recurring, stable, and lender-preferred) from transactional spot freight (volatile, margin-thin, and potentially excluded from SBA lender underwriting). The split between these revenue types can move the effective multiple by a full turn or more.
Customer Concentration Disclosure Threshold
Establish a specific revenue concentration threshold — typically no single customer exceeding 20–25% of revenue — and require the seller to represent this as a warranty. If any customer exceeds this threshold, negotiate a corresponding price adjustment mechanism or earnout trigger tied to that customer's retention. Undisclosed concentration is one of the most common post-close surprises in 3PL acquisitions.
Earnout Measurement Metric Selection
The choice between revenue retention, gross margin, and EBITDA as the earnout metric has major implications for both parties. Revenue retention metrics favor sellers by measuring factors within their sphere of influence during transition. EBITDA-based earnouts give buyers more control but create disputes over cost allocation post-close. For most 3PL deals, a hybrid approach — revenue retention for year one, EBITDA for year two — balances risk appropriately.
Seller Note Standby Period and Acceleration Rights
SBA lenders typically require seller notes to be on full standby for 24 months, meaning the seller receives no principal or interest during that period. Negotiate whether interest accrues during standby and whether there are any acceleration triggers if the buyer defaults on the SBA loan. Sellers with near-term cash needs should negotiate a higher cash-at-close rather than relying on seller note payments.
Key Employee Retention Commitments and Non-Solicitation
In freight brokerage and managed 3PL operations, account managers, dispatchers, and operations leads often hold the carrier and customer relationships that give the business its value. Negotiate specific retention bonuses for identified key employees funded by the seller or structured as a purchase price hold-back, along with non-solicitation agreements preventing the seller from hiring away these employees post-close. Define the retention period — typically 12–24 months — and the consequences of departure.
Find Third-Party Logistics (3PL) Businesses to Acquire
Enough information to write a strong LOI on day one — free to join.
For most lower middle market 3PL transactions in the $1M–$5M revenue range, a 45–60 day exclusivity period is standard. This timeline allows the buyer to submit an SBA loan application, conduct customer contract and technology stack reviews, and engage legal counsel for purchase agreement drafting. If the seller's financials are not yet on accrual basis or the data room is incomplete at LOI signing, request the exclusivity clock to start only upon receipt of a complete data room rather than LOI execution.
Yes, and this is one of the most overlooked elements in 3PL LOIs. The seller's carrier network — particularly preferential capacity access, negotiated rate agreements, and informal priority relationships with regional asset carriers — is often a primary value driver. The LOI should reference a carrier relationship schedule to be provided in due diligence and include language requiring the seller to facilitate formal introductions to the top 10–20 carrier partners as part of the transition plan. Failure to address this upfront creates disputes about what the buyer actually purchased.
Earnouts are common in 3PL acquisitions precisely because so much of the business value is tied to relationships that are difficult to verify will transfer. Expect earnouts in 15–40% of transactions, typically ranging from 10–20% of total purchase price and paid over 12–24 months. The most defensible structure ties the earnout to revenue retention from specifically named customer accounts rather than aggregate company metrics, which are too easily influenced by the buyer's post-close operational decisions. Include a monthly reporting obligation from the buyer so the seller can track performance throughout the measurement period.
Yes, SBA lenders typically require an executed LOI as part of the initial loan package along with three years of business tax returns, a buyer's personal financial statement, and the buyer's business plan or acquisition rationale. The LOI should include the proposed purchase price, deal structure including the seller note amount and standby provisions, intended SBA loan amount, and buyer equity contribution. Some lenders prefer to see a specific SBA 7(a) loan reference in the LOI, so confirm requirements with your preferred lender before finalizing the document.
If diligence confirms that one customer represents more than 25–30% of revenue and this was not fully disclosed during the LOI process, the buyer has several options: (i) renegotiate the purchase price downward to reflect the concentration risk and lower the applicable EBITDA multiple; (ii) restructure a larger portion of the purchase price into an earnout contingent on that customer's retention; or (iii) request a specific indemnification escrow funded by the seller to cover potential revenue loss if the customer does not renew within 12–18 months post-close. The LOI should always include language stating that material diligence findings may result in price renegotiation to preserve this leverage.
Absolutely. If the 3PL operates as a licensed freight broker under FMCSA authority, the LOI should confirm that the seller holds an active broker authority (MC number), is in compliance with current FMCSA bond requirements ($75,000 BMC-84 surety bond), and has no pending FMCSA enforcement actions or cargo claim disputes above a disclosed threshold. Broker authority is non-transferable in an asset deal — the buyer must apply for new authority — so the deal structure (asset vs. equity) has direct regulatory implications that should be resolved at the LOI stage to avoid post-close delays.
More Third-Party Logistics (3PL) Guides
More LOI Templates
Get enough diligence data to write a confident LOI from day one.
Create your free accountNo credit card required
For Buyers
For Sellers