A section-by-section LOI guide built specifically for foot and ankle practice acquisitions — covering purchase price, physician earnouts, payer mix contingencies, and healthcare compliance carve-outs.
A Letter of Intent (LOI) is the foundational document that shapes every subsequent stage of a podiatry practice acquisition. It signals buyer seriousness, locks in key commercial terms, and establishes the exclusivity window you need to complete due diligence without competition. In podiatry acquisitions, the LOI carries outsized importance compared to other lower middle market deals because critical deal-specific risks — physician revenue concentration, Medicare payer mix exposure, billing compliance history, and corporate practice of medicine restrictions — must be surfaced and addressed in the LOI before significant legal and diligence fees are incurred. A well-drafted podiatry LOI will define the proposed purchase price and EBITDA multiple, structure any seller earnout tied to post-closing patient retention or revenue targets, establish a 30–60 day exclusivity period, and outline the scope of due diligence items specific to a healthcare practice. Sellers should understand that a signed LOI is not a binding purchase agreement, but the exclusivity and no-shop provisions typically are binding, making it essential to negotiate those terms carefully. Buyers should use the LOI to signal sophistication around healthcare compliance — referencing Stark Law, HIPAA, and state corporate practice of medicine laws — which builds seller confidence and reduces the likelihood of the deal falling apart in later diligence stages. Most podiatry practice transactions in the $1M–$5M revenue range close at EBITDA multiples of 3x–5.5x, and the LOI is where that multiple gets anchored.
Find Podiatry Practice Businesses to AcquireParties and Practice Identification
Identifies the buyer entity, the seller (typically the physician-owner individually and/or their professional corporation or LLC), and the specific practice assets or entity being acquired. In podiatry, confirm whether the transaction is an asset purchase or equity purchase, as this affects liability exposure for prior billing and malpractice claims.
Example Language
This Letter of Intent is entered into as of [DATE] between [BUYER NAME or ENTITY], a [state] [LLC/corporation] ('Buyer'), and [SELLER PHYSICIAN NAME], D.P.M., and [PRACTICE LEGAL ENTITY NAME], a [state] professional corporation ('Seller'), with respect to Buyer's proposed acquisition of substantially all assets of [PRACTICE DBA NAME], a podiatry practice located at [ADDRESS] ('the Practice').
💡 Most podiatry acquisitions are structured as asset purchases to avoid assuming unknown liabilities — including Medicare overpayment exposure, prior coding errors, or undisclosed malpractice claims. Sellers often prefer equity sales for tax treatment, so be prepared to negotiate a gross-up in purchase price if agreeing to an equity structure. Confirm the state's corporate practice of medicine laws before naming the buyer entity, as certain states require the buyer to be a licensed physician or a physician-owned entity.
Purchase Price and Valuation Basis
Establishes the proposed total consideration, the EBITDA multiple applied, and how the seller's discretionary earnings or adjusted EBITDA was calculated. In podiatry practices, this section should explicitly reference the trailing twelve-month collections, the physician compensation addback methodology, and any adjustments for one-time revenue items like pandemic-era relief funds or non-recurring surgical cases.
Example Language
Buyer proposes to acquire the Practice for a total purchase price of $[AMOUNT] ('Purchase Price'), representing approximately [X]x the Practice's trailing twelve-month adjusted EBITDA of $[AMOUNT], calculated as net income plus owner physician compensation of $[AMOUNT], depreciation and amortization of $[AMOUNT], and non-recurring expenses of $[AMOUNT]. The Purchase Price shall be subject to adjustment based on final due diligence findings, including confirmed collections, payer mix composition, and accounts receivable quality.
💡 Podiatry practice valuations typically range from 3x–5.5x adjusted EBITDA. Practices with a single physician generating 90%+ of revenue will price toward the lower end; those with at least one associate DPM, strong orthotics revenue, and commercial payer mix domination can justify 4.5x–5.5x. Sellers frequently inflate addbacks by including discretionary personal expenses — car payments, personal health insurance, retirement contributions — so buyers should require a normalized compensation benchmark (typically $150,000–$200,000 for a full-time podiatrist) rather than allowing uncapped addbacks.
Transaction Structure and Consideration Allocation
Defines how the purchase price will be paid, including cash at closing, SBA loan proceeds, seller note amount, and any earnout component. In podiatry, it is standard to include a seller note and/or earnout to bridge valuation gaps arising from physician-dependent revenue and payer mix uncertainty.
Example Language
The Purchase Price shall be funded as follows: (i) $[AMOUNT] in cash at closing funded through SBA 7(a) proceeds, representing approximately [X]% of the Purchase Price; (ii) a seller promissory note of $[AMOUNT] bearing interest at [X]% per annum, payable over [24/36] months post-closing; and (iii) an earnout of up to $[AMOUNT] payable over 12–24 months post-closing, contingent upon the Practice achieving at least [X]% of trailing twelve-month collections during the earnout measurement period, with Seller's active participation under a Transition Services and Employment Agreement.
💡 SBA 7(a) loans for podiatry acquisitions typically require a 10–15% buyer equity injection and will require the selling physician to execute a personal guarantee waiver and provide 2–3 years of practice tax returns. Sellers should negotiate earnout measurement criteria that account for factors within their control — i.e., patient retention attributable to their active transition efforts — and exclude revenue shortfalls caused by payer rate changes, new competition, or buyer operational decisions. A seller note of 5–10% of the purchase price is often required by SBA lenders as evidence of seller confidence in the transaction.
Exclusivity and No-Shop Provision
Grants the buyer an exclusive negotiating window during which the seller agrees not to solicit or entertain offers from other potential buyers. This is one of the few binding provisions in a typical LOI and is critical for buyers who will invest significant time and money in healthcare-specific due diligence.
Example Language
In consideration of Buyer's commitment to proceed with due diligence and incur related costs, Seller agrees to a 45-day exclusive negotiation period commencing on the date of execution of this Letter of Intent ('Exclusivity Period'). During the Exclusivity Period, Seller shall not, directly or indirectly, solicit, encourage, or enter into discussions with any other party regarding the sale of the Practice or its assets. Buyer may request a 15-day extension of the Exclusivity Period upon written notice if due diligence remains ongoing and in good faith.
💡 Forty-five to sixty days is standard for podiatry acquisitions given the complexity of healthcare due diligence — payer credentialing review, billing compliance audit, and state corporate practice of medicine analysis all require specialized advisors. Sellers should resist exclusivity periods exceeding 60 days without a hard closing deadline or automatic termination clause. Buyers should tie the exclusivity extension right to specific documented diligence milestones, not open-ended negotiation.
Due Diligence Scope and Access
Outlines the categories of information the buyer requires access to during the diligence period, including financial records, payer contracts, credentialing files, billing data, and compliance documentation. In podiatry, this section should be more detailed than a typical lower middle market LOI due to healthcare-specific regulatory exposure.
Example Language
Seller shall provide Buyer with reasonable access to the following within 10 business days of LOI execution: (i) three years of practice tax returns, profit and loss statements, and accounts receivable aging reports; (ii) all payer contracts and fee schedules with Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial insurers, including reimbursement rates for CPT codes [99213, 99214, 11720, 11721, A5500, L3000] and other high-volume codes; (iii) credentialing files for all licensed providers including the selling physician, any associate DPMs, and mid-level providers; (iv) EHR system data including patient visit volume by provider, diagnosis distribution, and no-show rates; (v) all prior billing audits, Medicare RAC audit correspondence, or insurance dispute records; and (vi) facility lease, equipment list, and all material vendor contracts.
💡 Buyers should insist on seeing CPT code-level billing data, not just summary revenue figures. This allows analysis of whether revenue is concentrated in high-risk codes subject to Medicare audit scrutiny (e.g., routine foot care billed under diabetic care exemptions). Sellers should require a mutual non-disclosure agreement before sharing any patient-level data and ensure all PHI disclosures are structured to comply with HIPAA's business associate agreement requirements. Billing compliance red flags — high denial rates, frequent downcoding, large accounts receivable over 120 days — are best identified at this stage before purchase price is finalized.
Representations and Warranties Preview
Identifies the key representations the seller will be expected to make in the final purchase agreement, alerting the seller to areas where they must disclose known issues or face post-closing indemnification liability. In podiatry, representations around billing compliance, licensure, and payer contract assignability are especially material.
Example Language
The definitive purchase agreement will include customary representations and warranties from Seller, including but not limited to: (i) that all provider licenses, DEA registrations, and Medicare/Medicaid provider enrollments are current, valid, and in good standing; (ii) that the Practice has no pending or threatened billing audits, Medicare overpayment demands, or insurance fraud investigations; (iii) that all payer contracts are assignable or re-credentialing timelines have been disclosed; (iv) that the Practice's financial statements fairly represent its financial condition with all physician compensation and personal expenses properly disclosed; and (v) that Seller is not aware of any referral source or patient relationships that are contractually restricted or personally exclusive to the selling physician.
💡 Healthcare-specific reps are non-negotiable for any sophisticated buyer. Sellers should conduct an internal compliance review before LOI execution to identify any billing exposure — undisclosed overpayments, improper modifier usage, or upcoding — and either remediate or disclose proactively. Undisclosed compliance issues discovered post-closing expose sellers to indemnification claims that can claw back significant portions of the purchase price. Buyers should negotiate a survival period of 3–5 years for healthcare compliance representations given Medicare's look-back audit window.
Physician Transition and Employment Agreement
Outlines the terms under which the selling physician will remain engaged post-closing to support patient and referral source transition, and defines the earnout linkage to their post-closing clinical activity. This is the most deal-critical section in podiatry acquisitions where the seller-physician is the primary revenue driver.
Example Language
As a condition to closing, Seller agrees to execute a Transition Services and Employment Agreement providing for Seller's continued clinical engagement with the Practice for a minimum of [12–24] months post-closing at a compensation rate of $[AMOUNT] per annum or [X]% of collections generated by Seller, whichever is greater. The agreement shall include a non-compete covenant restricting Seller from practicing podiatry within a [10-mile] radius of the Practice location for [24–36] months following the end of the transition period, subject to applicable state law.
💡 The transition agreement is where most podiatry deals succeed or fail. Buyers should structure physician compensation post-closing to incentivize active patient handoff — a declining compensation scale tied to patient transfer milestones is more effective than a flat salary. Sellers should negotiate floor compensation guarantees that do not fluctuate based on patient volume during the transition period, as patient scheduling decisions post-acquisition are partially outside their control. Non-compete scope should be reviewed by a healthcare attorney in the practice's state, as enforceability varies significantly and overly broad non-competes can deter a selling physician from signing.
Conditions to Closing
Lists the material conditions that must be satisfied before either party is obligated to close the transaction, including financing, regulatory approvals, payer credentialing, and lease assignment. In podiatry, payer re-credentialing timelines are frequently underestimated and should be addressed explicitly.
Example Language
The closing of the proposed transaction shall be conditioned upon: (i) Buyer securing SBA 7(a) financing in an amount sufficient to fund the cash portion of the Purchase Price; (ii) satisfactory completion of Buyer's due diligence in its sole discretion; (iii) execution of a definitive asset purchase agreement with representations, warranties, and indemnification provisions acceptable to both parties; (iv) assignment or re-negotiation of the Practice facility lease on terms acceptable to Buyer; (v) initiation of Medicare, Medicaid, and material commercial payer credentialing applications for the acquiring entity, with parties agreeing to a billing transition arrangement during re-credentialing if required; and (vi) no material adverse change in Practice revenue, staffing, or compliance status between LOI execution and closing.
💡 Medicare re-credentialing for a new practice entity can take 60–120 days and will interrupt billing if not managed proactively. Buyers and sellers should agree on a billing transition arrangement — often the seller continues to bill under their NPI during re-credentialing with proceeds flowing to the buyer — and document this in the LOI to prevent disputes. Buyers should also confirm whether the practice's commercial payer contracts include assignment provisions or require re-negotiation, as some large commercial insurers treat an ownership change as a contract termination event.
Confidentiality
Establishes mutual obligations to protect the confidentiality of transaction discussions, practice financial information, and patient data. In podiatry, HIPAA compliance requirements layer on top of standard confidentiality provisions and must be explicitly addressed.
Example Language
Both parties agree to maintain strict confidentiality regarding the existence and terms of this proposed transaction, including all financial, operational, and patient-related information exchanged during due diligence. Any disclosure of protected health information during diligence shall be conducted pursuant to a HIPAA-compliant Business Associate Agreement to be executed prior to the exchange of any patient-level data. Neither party shall disclose the existence of this LOI to employees, referral sources, or insurance representatives without the prior written consent of the other party.
💡 Staff disclosure is the most common confidentiality breach in podiatry practice sales and can trigger key employee departures that reduce practice value before closing. Sellers should negotiate a mutual obligation on the buyer to maintain confidentiality with any third-party advisors (lenders, attorneys, accountants) through their own NDAs. Buyers should avoid contacting the practice's payer representatives or referral sources directly until the transaction has been announced in a controlled manner, typically at or immediately after closing.
Non-Binding Nature and Governing Law
Confirms that the LOI is non-binding except for specified binding provisions (exclusivity, confidentiality, and expense allocation), and establishes the governing law for any disputes. This section prevents either party from claiming breach of contract if negotiations terminate before a definitive agreement is reached.
Example Language
Except for the provisions set forth in the Exclusivity and Confidentiality sections of this Letter of Intent, which shall be binding upon execution, this Letter of Intent is non-binding and does not constitute a binding agreement to complete the proposed transaction. Neither party shall have any legal obligation to proceed with the transaction unless and until a definitive purchase agreement has been fully executed by both parties. This Letter of Intent shall be governed by the laws of the State of [STATE], without regard to conflicts of law principles.
💡 Sellers occasionally attempt to argue that an LOI creates binding obligations when a buyer walks away after due diligence. The non-binding language must be explicit and unambiguous. However, buyers should be cautious about exercising termination rights on pretextual grounds after the seller has taken the practice off market — courts in some states have found implied good faith obligations even in non-binding LOIs. The binding exclusivity and confidentiality provisions should be separated into a standalone section with a clear heading to avoid any ambiguity about their enforceability.
EBITDA Addback for Selling Physician Compensation
In podiatry practices, the selling physician's compensation is typically addback to calculate adjusted EBITDA, but the replacement compensation rate assumed in the valuation has a major impact on the final multiple. Buyers should negotiate a market-rate replacement compensation of $150,000–$200,000 for a full-time podiatrist rather than accepting inflated addbacks based on the owner's current draws. Sellers should ensure that legitimate business benefits — CME expenses, medical malpractice insurance, and professional association dues — are included in the addback rather than treated as pure personal expenses.
Earnout Measurement Period and Revenue Baseline
Earnouts in podiatry acquisitions are commonly structured around post-closing collections retention, but the measurement methodology must be negotiated carefully. Sellers should insist that the baseline revenue used to calculate earnout achievement reflects normalized operations and excludes any revenue disruption caused by buyer decisions — such as staff changes, schedule modifications, or marketing cutbacks. Buyers should cap earnout payments at a defined percentage of the gap between LOI valuation and the lower post-closing revenue realization, and should require the seller-physician's active clinical participation as a precondition to earnout eligibility.
Payer Contract Assignability and Re-Credentialing Risk Allocation
Commercial payer contracts for podiatry practices vary significantly in their assignability provisions. Some Blue Cross Blue Shield and UnitedHealth contracts require the practice to re-apply as a new provider entity, which can take 60–120 days and create a billing gap. The LOI should specify who bears the cost and administrative burden of re-credentialing and whether a billing arrangement under the seller's NPI will bridge the gap. Sellers should negotiate a clear carve-out from any revenue shortfall earnout calculation during payer credentialing transition periods.
Non-Compete Scope, Duration, and Geographic Radius
Non-compete agreements for selling podiatrists must balance legitimate buyer protection with the physician's ability to practice their licensed specialty. Overly broad non-competes covering entire metropolitan areas or spanning 5+ years may be unenforceable in states like California, Colorado, or North Dakota that have strong physician non-compete restrictions. A defensible podiatry non-compete typically restricts practice within 5–15 miles of the acquired location for 2–3 years. Buyers should also negotiate a non-solicitation covenant preventing the seller from recruiting staff or contacting patients separately from the geographic non-compete.
Working Capital Peg and Accounts Receivable Treatment
In asset purchases, buyers and sellers must negotiate whether accounts receivable are included in the purchase price or retained by the seller. Most podiatry practice asset purchases exclude AR from the sale, with the seller collecting outstanding receivables post-closing. However, the buyer needs protection against the seller aggressively collecting pre-closing AR in ways that damage payer relationships or create patient service issues. The LOI should specify the working capital peg methodology, define which AR the seller retains collection rights to, and establish a timeline after which uncollected AR is written off rather than pursued in ways that harm the practice's patient relationships.
Healthcare Compliance Indemnification Carve-Out
Medicare and Medicaid billing compliance risk is unique to healthcare acquisitions and requires negotiated indemnification terms that go beyond standard commercial M&A language. The LOI should signal that the definitive agreement will include a specific compliance indemnification carve-out, with the seller retaining full indemnification liability for pre-closing billing errors, overpayment demands, or RAC audit assessments regardless of when the government issues the claim. Sellers should negotiate a cap on compliance indemnification liability tied to the purchase price and a survival period aligned with Medicare's 6-year look-back window rather than agreeing to unlimited post-closing exposure.
Find Podiatry Practice Businesses to Acquire
Enough information to write a strong LOI on day one — free to join.
Forty-five to sixty days is the standard exclusivity window for podiatry practice acquisitions in the $1M–$5M revenue range. This is longer than many lower middle market business deals because healthcare-specific due diligence requires specialized advisors. You need time to complete a billing and coding compliance review, analyze payer-level reimbursement data, verify provider credentialing files, review Medicare enrollment status, and confirm state corporate practice of medicine compliance — each of which requires coordination with healthcare attorneys, billing consultants, and potentially your SBA lender. Sellers should resist exclusivity periods beyond 60 days unless a hard closing date is included, and buyers should include an extension right of 15 days tied to documented diligence progress rather than an open-ended extension.
The large majority of podiatry practice acquisitions are structured as asset purchases, and for good reason. An asset purchase allows the buyer to acquire specific practice assets — patient records, equipment, goodwill, trade name, and contracts — without assuming the seller's unknown liabilities, including Medicare overpayment exposure, prior billing errors, unresolved malpractice claims, and employment disputes. Equity purchases (buying the seller's LLC or professional corporation) transfer all historical liabilities to the buyer even if undisclosed. Sellers often prefer equity sales for tax treatment reasons, so buyers who agree to an equity structure should negotiate an indemnification escrow holdback and a higher healthcare compliance rep survival period to offset the additional liability exposure. Note that some states with corporate practice of medicine restrictions require the buyer to be a licensed podiatrist or physician-owned entity regardless of transaction structure.
Podiatry practice acquisitions in the lower middle market typically close at 3x–5.5x adjusted EBITDA. Where within that range your offer lands depends on several value drivers. Practices at the higher end of the range (4.5x–5.5x) typically have at least one associate DPM generating independent revenue, a commercial-dominated payer mix with Medicare below 50%, strong recurring revenue from orthotics and diabetic care programs, clean billing history with low denial rates, and documented referral relationships that are practice-level rather than concentrated in the selling physician. Practices at the lower end (3x–3.5x) are typically sole-physician operations with 65%+ Medicare payer mix and no non-physician revenue generation. Your LOI should anchor the multiple based on the information available at LOI signing, with explicit language reserving the right to adjust purchase price based on final due diligence findings.
The selling physician's transition agreement is the most deal-critical component of any podiatry acquisition and should be outlined in the LOI before diligence begins. At minimum, the LOI should specify the transition period duration (typically 12–24 months), compensation structure (fixed salary, percentage of collections, or hybrid), earnout linkage to patient retention milestones, and the geographic and temporal scope of any post-transition non-compete. Buyers should structure post-closing physician compensation to incentivize active patient handoff — a declining compensation scale over the transition period tied to completed patient introductions to the incoming provider is more effective than a flat salary with no performance link. Sellers should negotiate floor compensation guarantees that do not vary based on scheduling or operational decisions made by the new owner.
Yes, HIPAA compliance requirements apply to the diligence process and must be addressed before any patient-level data is shared between seller and buyer. Before exchanging EHR data, patient visit volume reports, diagnosis distributions, or accounts receivable aging with patient identifiers, the parties must execute a HIPAA-compliant Business Associate Agreement (BAA). Most diligence can be conducted using de-identified aggregate data — total visit volume, revenue per procedure type, payer mix percentages — without triggering HIPAA's PHI disclosure rules. The LOI should explicitly require a BAA as a precondition to any patient data access and should specify that all patient records remain with the covered entity (the practice) during diligence, with buyer access limited to on-site review or anonymized data extracts.
Medicare re-credentialing delays are one of the most common operational risks in podiatry practice acquisitions, and the LOI should address this scenario explicitly rather than leaving it to the definitive agreement. When a new practice entity acquires a podiatry practice's assets, it must enroll as a new Medicare provider under its own NPI, which CMS typically processes in 60–90 days but can extend to 120+ days. During this window, the new entity cannot bill Medicare directly. The standard solution is a transitional billing arrangement under which the selling physician continues to bill Medicare under their existing provider number, with collections remitted to the buyer entity per a written agreement. This arrangement must be structured carefully to comply with Medicare's anti-assignment rules and should be disclosed in the LOI as an expected feature of the transaction structure. Buyers should factor this revenue timing lag into their SBA loan cash flow projections.
More Podiatry Practice Guides
More LOI Templates
Get enough diligence data to write a confident LOI from day one.
Create your free accountNo credit card required
For Buyers
For Sellers